netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: andrew@whydna.net, jelaas@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skb_tx_hash() improvements
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 08:12:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49FE874F.8000503@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090503.144418.255531526.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller a écrit :
> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 09:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
> 
>> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
>> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 11:29:54 +0200
>>
>>> -	} else if (skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_hash) {
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * Try to avoid an expensive divide, for symmetric setups :
>>> +		 *   number of tx queues of output device ==
>>> +		 *   number of rx queues of incoming device
>>> +		 */
>>> +		if (hash >= dev->real_num_tx_queues)
>>> +			hash %= dev->real_num_tx_queues;
>>> +		return hash;
>>> +	}
>> Subtraction in a while() loop is almost certainly a lot
>> faster.
> 
> To move forward on this, I've commited the following to
> net-next-2.6, thanks!
> 
> net: Avoid modulus in skb_tx_hash() for forwarding case.
> 
> Based almost entirely upon a patch by Eric Dumazet.
> 
> The common case is to have num-tx-queues <= num_rx_queues
> and even if num_tx_queues is larger it will not be significantly
> larger.
> 
> Therefore, a subtraction loop is always going to be faster than
> modulus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> ---
>  net/core/dev.c |    8 ++++++--
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 8144295..3c8073f 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1735,8 +1735,12 @@ u16 skb_tx_hash(const struct net_device *dev, const struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
>  	u32 hash;
>  
> -	if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb))
> -		return skb_get_rx_queue(skb) % dev->real_num_tx_queues;
> +	if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
> +		hash = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
> +		while (unlikely (hash >= dev->real_num_tx_queues))
> +			hash -= dev->real_num_tx_queues;
> +		return hash;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_hash)
>  		hash = skb->sk->sk_hash;

Yes, I checked that compiler did not use a divide instruction here
(I remember it did on a similar loop in kernel, related to time)

Thank you


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-04  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-29 23:00 tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe) Andrew Dickinson
2009-04-30  9:07 ` Jens Låås
2009-04-30  9:24   ` David Miller
2009-04-30 10:51     ` Jens Låås
2009-04-30 11:05       ` David Miller
2009-04-30 14:04     ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-04-30 14:08       ` David Miller
2009-04-30 23:53         ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01  4:19           ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01  7:32             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01  7:47               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01  6:14           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01  6:19             ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01  6:40               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01  7:23                 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01  7:31                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01  7:34                     ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 21:37                   ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2009-05-01  8:29             ` [PATCH] net: skb_tx_hash() improvements Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01  8:52               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01  9:29                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 16:17                   ` David Miller
2009-05-03 21:44                     ` David Miller
2009-05-04  6:12                       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-05-01 16:08             ` tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe) David Miller
2009-05-01 16:48               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 17:22                 ` David Miller
2009-05-01 10:20 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49FE874F.8000503@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=andrew@whydna.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jelaas@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).