From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: andrew@whydna.net, jelaas@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skb_tx_hash() improvements
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 08:12:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49FE874F.8000503@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090503.144418.255531526.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller a écrit :
> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 09:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
>> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 11:29:54 +0200
>>
>>> - } else if (skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_hash) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * Try to avoid an expensive divide, for symmetric setups :
>>> + * number of tx queues of output device ==
>>> + * number of rx queues of incoming device
>>> + */
>>> + if (hash >= dev->real_num_tx_queues)
>>> + hash %= dev->real_num_tx_queues;
>>> + return hash;
>>> + }
>> Subtraction in a while() loop is almost certainly a lot
>> faster.
>
> To move forward on this, I've commited the following to
> net-next-2.6, thanks!
>
> net: Avoid modulus in skb_tx_hash() for forwarding case.
>
> Based almost entirely upon a patch by Eric Dumazet.
>
> The common case is to have num-tx-queues <= num_rx_queues
> and even if num_tx_queues is larger it will not be significantly
> larger.
>
> Therefore, a subtraction loop is always going to be faster than
> modulus.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 8144295..3c8073f 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1735,8 +1735,12 @@ u16 skb_tx_hash(const struct net_device *dev, const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> u32 hash;
>
> - if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb))
> - return skb_get_rx_queue(skb) % dev->real_num_tx_queues;
> + if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
> + hash = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
> + while (unlikely (hash >= dev->real_num_tx_queues))
> + hash -= dev->real_num_tx_queues;
> + return hash;
> + }
>
> if (skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_hash)
> hash = skb->sk->sk_hash;
Yes, I checked that compiler did not use a divide instruction here
(I remember it did on a similar loop in kernel, related to time)
Thank you
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-04 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-29 23:00 tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe) Andrew Dickinson
2009-04-30 9:07 ` Jens Låås
2009-04-30 9:24 ` David Miller
2009-04-30 10:51 ` Jens Låås
2009-04-30 11:05 ` David Miller
2009-04-30 14:04 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-04-30 14:08 ` David Miller
2009-04-30 23:53 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 4:19 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 7:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 7:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 6:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 6:19 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 6:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 7:23 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 7:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 7:34 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 21:37 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2009-05-01 8:29 ` [PATCH] net: skb_tx_hash() improvements Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 8:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 9:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 16:17 ` David Miller
2009-05-03 21:44 ` David Miller
2009-05-04 6:12 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-05-01 16:08 ` tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe) David Miller
2009-05-01 16:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 17:22 ` David Miller
2009-05-01 10:20 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49FE874F.8000503@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=andrew@whydna.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jelaas@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).