netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	haoki@redhat.com, mchan@broadcom.com, davidel@xmailserver.org,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf_counter: change cpu frequencies
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 12:39:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49FEC5E1.4040900@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090503072535.GA9455@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar a écrit :
> * Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote:
> 
>> Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>>> Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>>>  
>>>> But if I use plain "perf stat -a sleep 10"
>>>> it seems I get wrong values again (16 G cycles/sec) for all next perf sessions
>>>>
>>> Well, I confirm all my cpus switched from 3GHz to 2GHz, after
>>>
>>> "perf stat -a sleep 10"
>>>
>>> (but "perf stat -e instructions -e cycles -a sleep 10" doesnt trigger this problem)
>>>
>>> Nothing logged, and /proc/cpuinfo stills reports 3 GHz frequencies
>>>
>>> # cat unit.c
>>> main() {
>>>   int i;
>>>   for (i = 0 ; i < 10000000; i++)
>>>         getppid();
>>> }
>>> # time ./unit
>>>
>>> real    0m0.818s
>>> user    0m0.289s
>>> sys     0m0.529s
>>> # perf stat -a sleep 10 2>/dev/null
>>> # time ./unit
>>>
>>> real    0m1.122s
>>> user    0m0.482s
>>> sys     0m0.640s
>>>
>>> # tail -n 27 /proc/cpuinfo
>>> processor       : 7
>>> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
>>> cpu family      : 6
>>> model           : 23
>>> model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5450  @ 3.00GHz
>>> stepping        : 6
>>> cpu MHz         : 3000.102
>>> cache size      : 6144 KB
>>> physical id     : 1
>>> siblings        : 1
>>> core id         : 3
>>> cpu cores       : 4
>>> apicid          : 7
>>> initial apicid  : 7
>>> fdiv_bug        : no
>>> hlt_bug         : no
>>> f00f_bug        : no
>>> coma_bug        : no
>>> fpu             : yes
>>> fpu_exception   : yes
>>> cpuid level     : 10
>>> wp              : yes
>>> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority
>>> bogomips        : 6000.01
>>> clflush size    : 64
>>> power management:
>>>
>>> # grep CPU_FREQ .config
>>> # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ is not set
>>>
>>>
>>> perf_counter seems promising, but still... needs some bug hunting :)
>>>
>> Update :
>>
>> Mike Galbraith suggested me to try various things, and finally, I discovered
>> this frequency change was probably a BIOS problem on my HP BL460c G1
>>
>> System Options -> Power regulator for Proliant
>>
>> [*] HP Dynamic Power Savings Mode
>> [ ] HP Static Low Power Mode
>> [ ] HP Static High Performance Mode
>> [ ] OS Control Mode
>>
>>
>> I switched it to 'OS Control Mode'
>>
>> Then acpi-cpufreq could load, and no more frequencies changes on a "perf -a sleep 10" 
>> session, using or not cpufreq.
>> (Supported cpufreq speeds on these cpus : 1999 & 2999 MHz)
>>
>> So it was a BIOS issue
> 
> ah! That makes quite a bit of sense. The BIOS interfering with an OS 
> feature ... Was that the default setting in the BIOS?

This was default setting in BIOS, yes.

> 
>> # perf stat -a sleep 10
>>
>>  Performance counter stats for 'sleep':
>>
>>    80005.418223  task clock ticks     (msecs)
>>           80266  context switches     (events)
>>               3  CPU migrations       (events)
>>             486  pagefaults           (events)
>>    240013851624  CPU cycles           (events) << good >>
>>    239076501419  instructions         (events)
>>          679464  cache references     (events)
>>   <not counted>  cache misses
>>
>>  Wall-clock time elapsed: 10000.468808 msecs
> 
> That looks perfect now.
> 
> It would also be really nice to have a sysrq-p dump of your PMU 
> state before you've done any profiling. Is there any trace of the 
> BIOS meddling with them, that we could detect (and warn about) 
> during bootup?

Difference is that on BIOS set to 'OS Control Mode' I see one more entry in ACPI list :

[    0.000000] ACPI: SSDT cfe5b000 004C9 (v01 HP        SSDTP 00000001 INTL 20030228)

...
And these 8 additional lines after (one per cpu)
[    0.706697] ACPI: SSDT cfe5c000 002DA (v01 HP        SSDT0 00000001 INTL 20030228)
[    0.707250] ACPI: SSDT cfe5c300 002DA (v01 HP        SSDT1 00000001 INTL 20030228)
[    0.707768] ACPI: SSDT cfe5c600 002DA (v01 HP        SSDT2 00000001 INTL 20030228)
[    0.708376] ACPI: SSDT cfe5c900 002DF (v01 HP        SSDT3 00000001 INTL 20030228)
[    0.708964] ACPI: SSDT cfe5cc00 002DA (v01 HP        SSDT4 00000001 INTL 20030228)
[    0.709567] ACPI: SSDT cfe5cf00 002DA (v01 HP        SSDT5 00000001 INTL 20030228)
[    0.710122] ACPI: SSDT cfe5d200 002DA (v01 HP        SSDT6 00000001 INTL 20030228)
[    0.710713] ACPI: SSDT cfe5d500 002DA (v01 HP        SSDT7 00000001 INTL 20030228)

Also, if this option is set to default (HP Dynamic Power Savings Mode) I get :

# modprobe acpi-cpufreq
FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq (/lib/modules/2.6.30-rc4-tip-01560-gdd5fa92/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko): No such device

but no kernel message logged.

Might be possible to add some kind of warning yes, I can test a patch if you want.



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-04 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-24 20:10 udp ping pong with various process bindings (and correct cpu mappings) Christoph Lameter
2009-04-24 21:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-25 15:47 ` [PATCH] net: Avoid extra wakeups of threads blocked in wait_for_packet() Eric Dumazet
2009-04-26  9:04   ` David Miller
2009-04-26 10:46     ` [PATCH] poll: Avoid extra wakeups Eric Dumazet
2009-04-26 13:33       ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-26 14:27         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28  9:15       ` David Miller
2009-04-28  9:24         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 14:21       ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 14:58         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 15:06         ` [PATCH] poll: Avoid extra wakeups in select/poll Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 19:05           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 20:05             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 20:14               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 20:33                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 20:49                   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 21:04                     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 21:00                       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 21:05                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 21:04                         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 21:11                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29  9:11                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-30 10:49                           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-30 11:57                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-30 14:08                               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-30 16:07                                 ` [BUG] perf_counter: change cpu frequencies Eric Dumazet
2009-05-03  6:06                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-03  7:25                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-04 10:39                                       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-04-30 21:24                                 ` [PATCH] poll: Avoid extra wakeups in select/poll Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-29  7:20           ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-29  7:35             ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-29  7:37               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29  9:22               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29  7:39             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29  8:26               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29  9:16           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29  9:36             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 10:27               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 12:29                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 13:07                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 15:53                   ` Davide Libenzi
2009-04-28  9:26   ` [PATCH] net: Avoid extra wakeups of threads blocked in wait_for_packet() David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49FEC5E1.4040900@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=haoki@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).