From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anton Volkov Subject: Possible race in ks8851_mll.ko Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:57:32 +0300 Message-ID: <49e80d06-531e-178e-1cb0-3293f275847f@ispras.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ldv-project@linuxtesting.org, Alexey Khoroshilov To: david.choi@micrel.com, davem@davemloft.net Return-path: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hello. While searching for races in the Linux kernel I've come across "drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851_mll.ko" module. Here is a question that I came up with while analyzing results. Lines are given using the info from Linux v4.12. Consider the following case: Thread 1: Thread 2: ks8851_probe ks = netdev_priv(netdev) register_netdev ks_start_xmit ->ks_soft_reset ->ks_tx_fifo_space ->ks_wrreg16 ->ks_rdreg16 ks->cmd_reg_cache = ... ks->cmd_reg_cache = ... (ks8851_mll.c: line 536) (ks8851_mll.c: line 505) iowrite16(ks->cmd_reg_cache) iowrite16(ks->cmd_reg_cache) In this case early registration of netdev leads to callback interference in the initialization process. Both ks_wrreg16() and ks_rdreg16() use the same ks. If one of them changes the ks->cmd_reg_cache it is possible that both will use the same value though it should be different. Is this race feasible from your point of view? Thank you for your time. -- Anton Volkov Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS web: http://linuxtesting.org e-mail: avolkov@ispras.ru