From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove DMA_nBIT_MASK macro Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 11:03:29 +0200 Message-ID: <4A02A3E1.90706@gmail.com> References: <20090507141114M.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20090506223452.65e545d8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4A029BE1.4090309@cn.fujitsu.com> <4A029FD1.1050007@gmail.com> <4A02A2D8.4090209@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , FUJITA Tomonori , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk To: Yang Hongyang Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.218.174]:56721 "EHLO mail-bw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752298AbZEGJDe (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 05:03:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A02A2D8.4090209@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/07/2009 10:59 AM, Yang Hongyang wrote: > Jiri Slaby wrote: >> Something like an irq flags deprecation in the past: >> http://lwn.net/Articles/229673/ >> ? > > good catch,but this need to be modified (add one line is enough)to cause their use to > cause __deprecated warnings. I'm lost, that inline does it, right?