From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Riepe Subject: Re: 2.6.27.19 + 28.7: network timeouts for r8169 and 8139too Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 08:27:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4A0A6862.3020809@googlemail.com> References: <200903041828.49972.m.bueker@berlin.de> <4A06D8D2.4010505@googlemail.com> <1242001754.4093.12.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org> <200905112248.44868.mb@bu3sch.de> <4A09EE13.3020102@googlemail.com> <20090513061138.GA11106@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Krzysztof Halasa , Michael Buesch , David Dillow , Rui Santos , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Michael_B=FCker?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Francois Romieu Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com ([209.85.218.222]:37603 "EHLO mail-bw0-f222.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752232AbZEMG1s (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 02:27:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090513061138.GA11106@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi! Francois Romieu wrote: > Michael Riepe : > [...] > >>How do lspci and dmesg report the chip? For mine, lspci says it's a >>"RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02)" while >>the kernel reports "RTL8168c/8111c at 0xffffc200000f6000, >>00:1c:c0:b6:1a:4a, XID 3c4000c0". > > > The XID is more specific than the first kernel report. lspci is less > accurate. Then the question is: Are there two different revisions with the same XID, or is it always the same chip that sometimes works and sometimes doesn't? I can't remember anybody reporting that the Intel D945GCLF2 works for them, so it might also be an interoperability issue. -- Michael "Tired" Riepe X-Tired: Each morning I get up I die a little