netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: never disappearing neighbors with netlink arp
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:35:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A26C256.9060606@iki.fi> (raw)

Hi,

I found a very peculiar problem related to neighbor cache when using the
netlink arp api. I never noticed this earlier until recently one of the nodes
with a lot of traffic started getting "Neighbour table overflow" messages.

I made my opennhrp daemon reply immediately with NUD_INVALID if the address is
known to be unreachable which sounds like the proper thing to do.

However, after some tedious reading of sources, it looks that:
1. Packet triggers new neighbor solicitation, entry goes to NUD_INCOMPLETE,
   the skb gets queued and based on my neightable config the first solicit
   is sent directly via netlink.
2. Userland receives and sends immediately back an update to NUD_INVALID.
3. Now it looks like net/core/neighbour.c:neigh_update() first checks for
   !(new & NUD_VALID), this matches and does the state transition, but the
   queued skb:s are not dequeued / error reported. Which leaves refs to the
   neigh entry.

Now what happens after this is still a bit unclear to me, but it looks like
the entry never gets garbage collected after this.

I can probably workaround this from userland by just not replying at all
for non-existent neighbors. But what would be the proper fix for this?
It sounds bad if userland can flood never expiring entries to kernel.
Would just a simple skb queue flush / error reporting be enough? Do we
need to update time stamps too? Do something additional?

Cheers,
  Timo

                 reply	other threads:[~2009-06-03 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A26C256.9060606@iki.fi \
    --to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).