From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: never disappearing neighbors with netlink arp
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:35:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A26C256.9060606@iki.fi> (raw)
Hi,
I found a very peculiar problem related to neighbor cache when using the
netlink arp api. I never noticed this earlier until recently one of the nodes
with a lot of traffic started getting "Neighbour table overflow" messages.
I made my opennhrp daemon reply immediately with NUD_INVALID if the address is
known to be unreachable which sounds like the proper thing to do.
However, after some tedious reading of sources, it looks that:
1. Packet triggers new neighbor solicitation, entry goes to NUD_INCOMPLETE,
the skb gets queued and based on my neightable config the first solicit
is sent directly via netlink.
2. Userland receives and sends immediately back an update to NUD_INVALID.
3. Now it looks like net/core/neighbour.c:neigh_update() first checks for
!(new & NUD_VALID), this matches and does the state transition, but the
queued skb:s are not dequeued / error reported. Which leaves refs to the
neigh entry.
Now what happens after this is still a bit unclear to me, but it looks like
the entry never gets garbage collected after this.
I can probably workaround this from userland by just not replying at all
for non-existent neighbors. But what would be the proper fix for this?
It sounds bad if userland can flood never expiring entries to kernel.
Would just a simple skb queue flush / error reporting be enough? Do we
need to update time stamps too? Do something additional?
Cheers,
Timo
reply other threads:[~2009-06-03 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A26C256.9060606@iki.fi \
--to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).