From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bonding-devel@lists.sf.net,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] BUG: bonding module can only be loaded once
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:14:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2EDEB0.2080006@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13521.1244568251@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>
Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
>
>> I'd expect its not the distros, but rather the applicances which might
>> still be using this. I know a vendor I used to work for a couple of
>> years ago just recently made the switch from 2.6.16 to a current kernel,
>> and I'd expect that they are still using this (I can find out tommorrow
>> if you want to know for sure). Vyatta likewise, I guess.
>
> Yes, I'd like to know for sure; thanks.
I'll let you know.
>>> If nobody has any heartburn at dropping support for multiple
>>> bonding instances on old distros, I'm as happy as anybody to remove all
>>> of the multiple load logic from bonding. There's been plenty of time
>>> for transitioning from "multiple load" to sysfs.
>> In my opinion it would need a feature-removal-schedule announcement.
>
> Yah, probably. The multiple load stuff was working fine as of,
> oh, a year or two ago, so I wasn't worried so much about getting rid of
> it. If it's causing problems, though, it's time for it to go (or be
> scheduled to go in the not too distant future). Can't keep driving that
> Ford Pinto forever.
Well, if it has been broken for long enough, maybe we don't need
a feature-removal-schedule warning.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 22:11 BUG: bonding module can only be loaded once Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-09 12:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-09 15:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-09 15:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-09 16:14 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-06-09 16:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-09 17:23 ` [PATCH] bonding: fix multiple module load problem Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-09 17:37 ` [Bonding-devel] " Jay Vosburgh
2009-06-09 17:24 ` [Bonding-devel] BUG: bonding module can only be loaded once Jay Vosburgh
2009-06-09 22:14 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-06-10 13:19 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2EDEB0.2080006@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).