From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] BUG: bonding module can only be loaded once Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:19:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4A2FB2EA.9040705@trash.net> References: <20090608151127.70146505@nehalam> <200906091406.45463.arnd@arndb.de> <20090609080232.45f81833@nehalam> <4A2E80B3.6010600@trash.net> <4752.1244564082@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <4A2E8D62.6090004@trash.net> <13521.1244568251@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <4A2EDEB0.2080006@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Arnd Bergmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bonding-devel@lists.sf.net, "David S. Miller" To: Jay Vosburgh Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:58419 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751395AbZFJNTi (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:19:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A2EDEB0.2080006@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Patrick McHardy wrote: > Jay Vosburgh wrote: >> Patrick McHardy wrote: >> >>> I'd expect its not the distros, but rather the applicances which might >>> still be using this. I know a vendor I used to work for a couple of >>> years ago just recently made the switch from 2.6.16 to a current kernel, >>> and I'd expect that they are still using this (I can find out tommorrow >>> if you want to know for sure). Vyatta likewise, I guess. >> >> Yes, I'd like to know for sure; thanks. > > I'll let you know. They are still using the module alias method, but on a kernel slightly older than the patch which broke this (2.6.25).