From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Timo_Ter=E4s?= Subject: Re: multicast for v2.6.29 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:41:19 +0300 Message-ID: <4A40E98F.5050903@iki.fi> References: <4A40E151.10007@iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com ([209.85.219.210]:53181 "EHLO mail-ew0-f210.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759055AbZFWOlS (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:41:18 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so174258ewy.37 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:41:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A40E151.10007@iki.fi> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Whoops. This was not supposed be sent on the list as-is. This is more of an RFC, for what I want to do in future. Multicast routing for NBMA destinations. The patch is quick hack, and breaks ABI, and not intended for inclusion. I suppose the multicast routing would need to be updated to Netlink era before doing this kind of thing. And remove the hard coded limits such as amount of MFC destinations and that you can have only one multicast router user space process. If you have any comments on the patch, they are appreciated. Thanks, Timo