From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: rib_trie / Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:52:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4A44A87A.4010601@gmail.com> References: <4A439C6B.9090502@itcare.pl> <4A43E9F1.90209@cosmosbay.com> <4A43F1A2.3090108@itcare.pl> <4A440019.3020009@gmail.com> <4A449DAD.9030606@itcare.pl> <4A44A41A.6080608@gmail.com> <4A44A728.1000202@itcare.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Linux Network Development list To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Staszewski?= Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:57924 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751587AbZFZKwv (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:52:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A44A728.1000202@itcare.pl> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pawe=B3 Staszewski a =E9crit : > Eric Dumazet pisze: =20 >> >> Yes, I was a fool to ask you to try 2.6.31-rc1, sorry. >> >> =20 > No problem with this test i lost only one test failover and no traffi= c > lost when system switch to primary routers. :) >> Even 2.6.30 is too young for a production machine. >> =20 > I alvays make like this - i have iBGP mesh with main access path of > machines on stable 2.6.28.9 kernels and second failover path on > machines that use newest kernel for testing in this case 2.6.29 b= ut > after some problems i try also 2.6.30 yestarday. >> 2.6.29.5 contains the fixes, Pawel, did you tried this version ? >> >> >> =20 > I will try 2.6.29.5 today >=20 OK thanks Please report (while machine has enough load) output of rtstat -c20 -i1 (rtstat is a symbolic link to lnstat, if not provided by your distro)