From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: make bridge-nf-call-*tables default configurable Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:05:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4A4B8954.70803@trash.net> References: <20090630.201630.134200035.davem@davemloft.net> <1246445158.598.30.camel@blaa> <4A4B3F9A.9060105@trash.net> <20090701.090250.52376308.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: markmc@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:62792 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751491AbZGAQFs (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:05:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090701.090250.52376308.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > From: Patrick McHardy > Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:51:06 +0200 > >> I agree, this has already caused an endless amount of problems for >> users due to the unexpected behaviour and, in some cases, bugs. >> >> Dave's point is certainly valid as well, until we change the defaults, >> distributions can use sysctl.conf. But I think we should move towards >> changing the defaults. > > You must do this via something like your suggestion, the > feature-removal-schedule.txt thing. Yes, of course. But I prefer the runtime warning (at least on top), my feeling is not many people actually read feature-removal-schedule.