From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gerg@uclinux.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fec: fix definition of 5272 version of FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:37:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A52A6CE.6010509@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090706.182704.192109619.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi David,
David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:23:34 +1000
>
>> fec: fix definition of 5272 version of FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register
>>
>> The ColdFire 5272 FEC driver has a different register address map
>> than other users of the FEC driver. And its definition of the
>> FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register is incorrect, it should be 0x14.
>> The fec interface cannot transmit data with the old value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
>
> This wasn't handled well at all.
>
> You sent me what amounted to a cleanup patch to remove the
> trailing ";" in these definitions first. I can only put
> that into net-next-2.6
That is not a cleanup patch. It is a bug fix. You cannot build
with those ";" in there:
CC drivers/net/fec.o
In file included from drivers/net/fec.c:51:
drivers/net/fec.h:49:19: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.h:50:19: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.h:51:18: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.h:52:17: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.h:53:25: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.h:54:25: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.c: In function ‘fec_enet_start_xmit’:
drivers/net/fec.c:352: error: expected expression before ‘;’ token
drivers/net/fec.c: In function ‘fec_enet_interrupt’:
> Now you send me a real bug fix for one of these macro
> values and it only applies on top of that ";" removal
> patch.
>
> That completely sucks. Now I can't just apply this to
> net-2.6 to get the bug fixed.
>
> You should have sent just the bug fix, then waited a week
> or so for the net-2.6 tree to get merged into the net-next-2.6
> tree and then you could send the ";" cleanup cleanly on top
> of that.
>
> I can't apply this so I'm rejecting it in patchwork.
Care to reconsider?
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-07 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-07 1:23 [PATCH] fec: fix definition of 5272 version of FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register Greg Ungerer
2009-07-07 1:27 ` David Miller
2009-07-07 1:37 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2009-07-07 1:52 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A52A6CE.6010509@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox