From: "Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Olsson <robert@robur.slu.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] Re: rib_trie / Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:34:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A565449.4050403@itcare.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090707235029.GA8207@ami.dom.local>
Jarek Poplawski pisze:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:56:13AM +0200, Paweł Staszewski wrote:
>
>> Jarek Poplawski pisze:
>>
> ...
>
>>> ---> (synchronize take 9; apply on top of the 2.6.29.x with the last
>>> all-in-one patch, or net-2.6)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Applied to 2.6.29.5 preempt/no-preempt and tested: - with preempt i make
>> only one test with sync_pages = 256 to check that is working :)
>>
>> So here are some tests for different sync_pages size.
>>
> ...
>
>> So i see in prev tests i make something wrong in time counting
>> So i modify test script and make tests again:
>>
>> echo 64 > /sys/module/fib_trie/parameters/sync_pages
>> Total size reach max in 13 sec
>>
>> echo 128 > /sys/module/fib_trie/parameters/sync_pages
>> Total size reach max in 10 sec
>>
>> echo 256 > /sys/module/fib_trie/parameters/sync_pages
>> Total size reach max in 10 sec
>>
>> And for sync_paqges >256 time for propagating routes is always 10sec.
>>
>
> So this means sync_pages 128 or 256 is reasonable.
>
>
>> Also today i have many messages in dmesg like this:
>> Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=25 size=11 bits
>> :)
>>
>
>
> This is something new and a bit surprising to me: the same threshold
> in previous tests didn't generate this? Do you mean more than:
> "Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits" before?
>
>
Yes. Sorry for that - this info was not all the day but only 5 minutes
when i was making tests.
This info was reported only when all iBGP peers was down/up fast.
>> And after tune :
>> /sys/module/fib_trie/parameters/inflate_threshold_root
>> no more info :)
>>
>
> With what value?
>
>
When i set 35 as inflate_threshold_root there was no info even if all
iBGP peers was down/up.
But i start to search when i have info about "Fix inflate_threshold_root"
And i see that the best is set this to 20 for me i have no info then in
normal router operation / without down/up bgp peers many times in short
time.
> Pawel, let's say that current defaults are:
> inflate_threshold_root 25 sync_pages 256
>
> I'd like you to try to check if e.g.:
> inflate_threshold_root 15 sync_pages 256
> can give you any visible or subjective difference worth tweaking it
> at all? (These stats from the next messages don't show this enough.)
> You don't need to hurry with this...
>
>
I will try to make more accurate tests in weekend.
Regards
Paweł Staszewski
> Thanks,
> Jarek P.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-09 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-25 15:48 rib_trie / Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-25 21:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-25 21:52 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-25 22:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-26 10:06 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-26 10:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-26 10:47 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-26 10:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-26 17:26 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-26 8:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 9:19 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-26 9:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 10:26 ` Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]
2009-06-26 12:42 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-26 12:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 13:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 13:52 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-26 15:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 15:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-26 15:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 16:15 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 16:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-26 16:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 17:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-26 18:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 18:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-26 20:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 20:26 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-26 20:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 21:20 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-27 19:20 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-27 20:51 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-28 0:28 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-28 11:11 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-29 7:57 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-28 11:04 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-28 12:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-28 14:35 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-28 15:32 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-28 15:48 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-28 19:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-28 21:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-29 8:08 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-29 8:47 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-29 9:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-29 9:43 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-29 8:33 ` [PATCH net-2.6] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-29 9:51 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-29 10:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-29 16:24 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-29 17:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-30 7:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-30 20:16 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-30 20:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-30 23:31 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-01 6:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
[not found] ` <20090701072409.GA12592@ff.dom.local>
2009-07-01 9:43 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-01 9:50 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-01 10:13 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-01 11:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-01 22:17 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-02 5:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-02 5:43 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-02 6:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-02 15:31 ` Robert Olsson
2009-07-02 19:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-02 21:32 ` Robert Olsson
2009-07-02 22:13 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-05 0:26 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-05 0:30 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-05 16:20 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-05 17:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-05 21:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-05 22:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-05 23:53 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-06 9:02 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-07 22:56 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-07 23:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-09 20:34 ` Paweł Staszewski [this message]
2009-07-14 19:41 ` [PATCH net-next] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-15 7:43 ` Robert Olsson
2009-07-15 13:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-17 8:08 ` Robert Olsson
2009-07-20 14:41 ` David Miller
2009-07-07 23:23 ` [PATCH net-2.6] " Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-07 23:30 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-14 18:33 ` [PATCH net-next] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-20 14:41 ` David Miller
2009-07-14 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next] ipv4: fib_trie: Use tnode_get_child_rcu() and node_parent_rcu() in lookups Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-20 14:41 ` David Miller
2009-07-05 0:31 ` [PATCH net-2.6] Re: rib_trie / Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-05 12:56 ` [PATCH -stable] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-05 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 " Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-08 2:42 ` David Miller
2009-07-08 6:44 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-29 10:58 ` [PATCH net-2.6] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-30 19:48 ` David Miller
2009-06-30 20:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-10 15:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A565449.4050403@itcare.pl \
--to=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=robert@robur.slu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).