From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] net: nf_conntrack_alloc() fixes
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:54:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A5E33D9.2030602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A5DF5B4.5090809@trash.net>
Patrick McHardy a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> [PATCH] net: nf_conntrack_alloc() should not use kmem_cache_zalloc()
>>
>> When a slab cache uses SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, we must be careful when allocating
>> objects, since slab allocator could give a freed object still used by lockless
>> readers.
>>
>> In particular, nf_conntrack RCU lookups rely on ct->tuplehash[xxx].hnnode.next
>> being always valid (ie containing a valid 'nulls' value, or a valid pointer to next
>> object in hash chain.)
>>
>> kmem_cache_zalloc() setups object with NULL values, but a NULL value is not valid
>> for ct->tuplehash[xxx].hnnode.next.
>>
>> Fix is to call kmem_cache_alloc() and do the zeroing ourself.
>
> I think this is still racy, please see below:
Nice catch indeed !
>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
>> index 7508f11..23feafa 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
>> @@ -561,17 +561,28 @@ struct nf_conn *nf_conntrack_alloc(struct net *net,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - ct = kmem_cache_zalloc(nf_conntrack_cachep, gfp);
>> + /*
>> + * Do not use kmem_cache_zalloc(), as this cache uses
>> + * SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.
>> + */
>> + ct = kmem_cache_alloc(nf_conntrack_cachep, gfp);
>> if (ct == NULL) {
>> pr_debug("nf_conntrack_alloc: Can't alloc conntrack.\n");
>> atomic_dec(&net->ct.count);
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> }
>> -
>
> __nf_conntrack_find() on another CPU finds the entry at this point.
>
>> + /*
>> + * Let ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].hnnode.next
>> + * and ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].hnnode.next unchanged.
>> + */
>> + memset(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_MAX], 0,
>> + sizeof(*ct) - offsetof(struct nf_conn, tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_MAX]));
>> spin_lock_init(&ct->lock);
>> atomic_set(&ct->ct_general.use, 1);
>
> nf_conntrack_find_get() successfully tries to atomic_inc_not_zero()
> at this point, following by another tuple comparison which is also
> successful.
>
> Am I missing something? I think we need to make sure the reference
> count is not increased until the new tuples are visible.
Yes you are right, and Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt should be
updated to reflect this as well (in insert algo, must use smp_wmb()
between obj->key assignment and refcnt assigment)
We'll have to change socket allocation too, this will be addressed
by a followup patch
Thanks Patrick !
[PATCH] net: nf_conntrack_alloc() fixes
When a slab cache uses SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, we must be careful when allocating
objects, since slab allocator could give a freed object still used by lockless
readers.
In particular, nf_conntrack RCU lookups rely on ct->tuplehash[xxx].hnnode.next
being always valid (ie containing a valid 'nulls' value, or a valid pointer to next
object in hash chain.)
kmem_cache_zalloc() setups object with NULL values, but a NULL value is not valid
for ct->tuplehash[xxx].hnnode.next.
Fix is to call kmem_cache_alloc() and do the zeroing ourself.
As spotted by Patrick, we also need to make sure lookup keys are committed to
memory before setting refcount to 1, or a lockless reader could get a reference
on the old version of the object. Its key re-check could then pass the barrier.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt | 7 ++++++-
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt b/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt
index 93cb28d..18f9651 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt
@@ -83,11 +83,12 @@ not detect it missed following items in original chain.
obj = kmem_cache_alloc(...);
lock_chain(); // typically a spin_lock()
obj->key = key;
-atomic_inc(&obj->refcnt);
/*
* we need to make sure obj->key is updated before obj->next
+ * or obj->refcnt
*/
smp_wmb();
+atomic_set(&obj->refcnt, 1);
hlist_add_head_rcu(&obj->obj_node, list);
unlock_chain(); // typically a spin_unlock()
@@ -159,6 +160,10 @@ out:
obj = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep);
lock_chain(); // typically a spin_lock()
obj->key = key;
+/*
+ * changes to obj->key must be visible before refcnt one
+ */
+smp_wmb();
atomic_set(&obj->refcnt, 1);
/*
* insert obj in RCU way (readers might be traversing chain)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 7508f11..b5869b9 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -561,23 +561,38 @@ struct nf_conn *nf_conntrack_alloc(struct net *net,
}
}
- ct = kmem_cache_zalloc(nf_conntrack_cachep, gfp);
+ /*
+ * Do not use kmem_cache_zalloc(), as this cache uses
+ * SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.
+ */
+ ct = kmem_cache_alloc(nf_conntrack_cachep, gfp);
if (ct == NULL) {
pr_debug("nf_conntrack_alloc: Can't alloc conntrack.\n");
atomic_dec(&net->ct.count);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
-
+ /*
+ * Let ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].hnnode.next
+ * and ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].hnnode.next unchanged.
+ */
+ memset(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_MAX], 0,
+ sizeof(*ct) - offsetof(struct nf_conn, tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_MAX]));
spin_lock_init(&ct->lock);
- atomic_set(&ct->ct_general.use, 1);
ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple = *orig;
+ ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].hnnode.pprev = NULL;
ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple = *repl;
+ ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].hnnode.pprev = NULL;
/* Don't set timer yet: wait for confirmation */
setup_timer(&ct->timeout, death_by_timeout, (unsigned long)ct);
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
ct->ct_net = net;
#endif
+ /*
+ * changes to lookup keys must be done before setting refcnt to 1
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+ atomic_set(&ct->ct_general.use, 1);
return ct;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_alloc);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-15 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-01 18:08 WARNING: at include/net/sock.h:417 udp_lib_unhash Tantilov, Emil S
2009-07-02 6:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-07 0:54 ` Emil S Tantilov
2009-07-07 7:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-07 7:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-07 16:14 ` [PATCH] net: sk_alloc() should not blindly overwrite memory Eric Dumazet
2009-07-07 18:33 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2009-07-07 22:33 ` [PATCH] net: sk_prot_alloc() " Eric Dumazet
2009-07-08 2:14 ` David Miller
2009-07-08 6:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-09 5:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-09 17:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-09 20:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-12 3:27 ` David Miller
2009-07-12 7:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-15 12:28 ` [PATCH] net: nf_conntrack_alloc() should not use kmem_cache_zalloc() Eric Dumazet
2009-07-15 15:28 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-07-15 19:54 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-07-16 9:13 ` [PATCH] net: sock_copy() fixes Eric Dumazet
2009-07-17 1:09 ` David Miller
2009-07-16 12:05 ` [PATCH] net: nf_conntrack_alloc() fixes Patrick McHardy
2009-07-08 17:02 ` [PATCH] net: sk_prot_alloc() should not blindly overwrite memory Tantilov, Emil S
2009-07-08 17:45 ` David Miller
2009-07-08 23:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-08 23:35 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2009-07-09 0:20 ` [PATCH] net: ip_push_pending_frames() fix Eric Dumazet
2009-07-09 14:32 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2009-07-09 14:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-12 3:27 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A5E33D9.2030602@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).