From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Carter Subject: Re: TESTING ROUTING CODE !! Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:16:07 -0500 Message-ID: <4A5F7C77.3090806@aesgi.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Leena M." , Kent Tu , "kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Mulyadi Santosa Return-path: Received: from smtp.aesgi.com ([207.234.130.182]:60509 "EHLO brahe.aesgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933223AbZGPUNZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:13:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I am currently using KVM. Works very well for creating virtual networks, and testing iptable and marking of packets for different routing code tests. I use KVM because it keeps all of the machines seperate, and of course, some of my machines are BSD. So if you have different code bases you want to try your modifications with, KVM is a good choice IMHO. -Gregory Carter -Applied Engineering Software Group -gcarter@aesgi.com On 07/16/2009 01:34 PM, Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Leena M. wrote: >> Any specific VM do you recommend , How about Xen ? >> >> Regards, >> Leena > > Please don't top post... > > Since you talked about routing protocol, I think User Mode Linux would > do just fine. It runs completely in user space and can be easily > hooked with gdb. > >