From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: add raw backend - some performance measurements Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:05:32 +0300 Message-ID: <4A65A0FC.6090204@Voltaire.com> References: <4A4CA747.1050509@Voltaire.com> <20090703023911.GD938@shareable.org> <4A534EC4.5030209@voltaire.com> <20090707145739.GB14392@shareable.org> <4A54B0F1.3070201@voltaire.com> <20090715203806.GF3056@shareable.org> <4A647B72.5090404@Voltaire.com> <20090720155308.GA9327@gondor.apana.org.au> <4A656824.7070100@Voltaire.com> <20090721072546.GA16131@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090721102733.GB22155@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Herbert Xu , Jamie Lokier , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jan Kiszka , Mark McLoughlin , Dor Laor , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from fwil.voltaire.com ([193.47.165.2]:16347 "EHLO exil.voltaire.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752802AbZGULFn (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:05:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090721102733.GB22155@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > With raw sockets, send will block or fail if the TX queue for device is > full. With tap+bridge, the buffer in tap has to fill up instead, which > is not the same. I'm not sure this is the issue here, but could be: the > benchmark is UDP, isn't it? Michael, What/where is this tap buffer? we're talking on VM TX, so looking on tun_get_user I see a call to skb_copy_datagram_from_iovec() to copy from the user buffer to an skb, then a call to netif_rx_ni() and that's it... As for your question, indeed udp, the VM runs netperf/UDP_STREAM Or.