From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13760] New: 2.6.30 kernel locks up with pppoe in back trace (regression) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:11:22 +0200 Message-ID: <4A68B5DA.5000307@gmail.com> References: <20090723000100.d74d6b1c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090723.091523.180916751.davem@davemloft.net> <20090723105141.5272aee1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090723.105344.244636270.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, for.poige+bugzilla.kernel.org@gmail.com, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f228.google.com ([209.85.218.228]:45678 "EHLO mail-bw0-f228.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751866AbZGWTLt (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:11:49 -0400 Received: by bwz28 with SMTP id 28so1021488bwz.37 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:11:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090723.105344.244636270.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote, On 07/23/2009 07:53 PM: > From: Andrew Morton > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:51:41 -0700 > >> I wouldn't have thought that pppoe would be affected by tty changes? >> >> As opposed to pppotty :) > > Good point. So it's unlikely any of the changes we're discussing > will influence this bug. Here is a link showing around pppoe problem quite similar to the one fixed later in pty.c by Alan Cox, so IMHO the current 2.6.31-rc is worth trying. From: Dave Young Subject: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:280 Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:36:13 +0800 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/131166 Jarek P.