From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@ixiacom.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: shrink struct net_device by #ifdef-ing protocol-specific members
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:28:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A6DB980.8010503@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A6DADCF.8010801@ixiacom.com>
Lucian Adrian Grijincu a écrit :
> Some members of net_device are used only by some protocols.
>
> If those protocols are not compiled (as modules or linked in) they
> should not take up space in the structure.
>
> These members are also used in inline functions defined in headers not
> protected by the protocol-specific CONFIG_ guards. Adding #ifdef CONFIG_*
> guards header wide is against the current style and more invasive than
> guarding only the definitions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@ixiacom.com>
> ---
> include/linux/inetdevice.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> include/net/ax25.h | 2 ++
> net/core/dev.c | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/inetdevice.h b/include/linux/inetdevice.h
> index acef2a7..88132ff 100644
> --- a/include/linux/inetdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/inetdevice.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ static __inline__ int bad_mask(__be32 mask, __be32 addr)
>
> #define endfor_ifa(in_dev) }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
> static inline struct in_device *__in_dev_get_rcu(const struct
> net_device *dev)
> {
> struct in_device *in_dev = dev->ip_ptr;
> @@ -192,6 +193,7 @@ __in_dev_get_rtnl(const struct net_device *dev)
> {
> return (struct in_device*)dev->ip_ptr;
> }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_INET */
>
> extern void in_dev_finish_destroy(struct in_device *idev);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 5a96a1a..d175bb9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -762,14 +762,28 @@ struct net_device
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_DSA
> void *dsa_ptr; /* dsa specific data */
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ATALK
> void *atalk_ptr; /* AppleTalk link */
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
> void *ip_ptr; /* IPv4 specific data */
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DECNET
> void *dn_ptr; /* DECnet specific data */
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6
I dont know if your patch will please that much.
For example, IPV6 can be a module, so you cannot only test
ifdef CONFIG_IPV6
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-27 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-27 13:38 [PATCH] net: shrink struct net_device by #ifdef-ing protocol-specific members Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2009-07-27 14:28 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A6DB980.8010503@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=lgrijincu@ixiacom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).