From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Gregory Haskins" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] AlacrityVM guest drivers Reply-To: Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:07:13 -0600 Message-ID: <4A7AAB510200005A00051BF3@sinclair.provo.novell.com> References: <20090803171030.17268.26962.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090806081955.GA9752@redhat.com> <4A7A8F7B0200005A00051B84@sinclair.provo.novell.com> <4A7AD29E.50800@redhat.com> <4A7A9C6B0200005A00051BB9@sinclair.provo.novell.com> <4A7ADE23.5010208@redhat.com> <4A7AA63A0200005A00051BE2@sinclair.provo.novell.com> <20090806135903.GA11530@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: , "Avi Kivity" , , , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090806135903.GA11530@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >>> On 8/6/2009 at 9:59 AM, in message <20090806135903.GA11530@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:45:30AM -0600, Gregory Haskins wrote: >> > (though still rooting for virtio). >> >> Heh...not to belabor the point to death, but virtio is orthogonal (you keep > forgetting that ;). > > venet and virtio aren't orthogonal, are they? See my last reply to Avi. Regards, -Greg