From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kaber@trash.net, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: dbaryshkov@gmail.com, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, "Thuermann, Urs,
Dr. (K-EFFI/I)" <urs.thuermann@volkswagen.de>,
Lothar Wassmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13954] New: Oops in rtnetlink code when creating can device
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:52:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A812354.8090704@volkswagen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090810215436.0bf47297.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> bugzilla web interface).
>
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:34:28 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>
>
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13954
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>> Summary: Oops in rtnetlink code when creating can device
>> Product: Networking
>> Version: 2.5
>> Kernel Version: 2.6.30-rc5
>> Platform: All
>> OS/Version: Linux
>> Tree: Mainline
>> Status: NEW
>> Severity: normal
>> Priority: P1
>> Component: Other
>> AssignedTo: acme@ghostprotocols.net
>> ReportedBy: dbaryshkov@gmail.com
>> Regression: No
>>
>>
>> I've got a nice oops when looking around new CAN code in kernel.
>>
>> root@qemux86:~# ip link add type can
>> [ 713.113325] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
>> [ 713.114216] IP: [<c13eecab>] register_netdevice+0xab/0x420
>> [ 713.114920] *pdpt = 00000000061bd001 *pde = 0000000000000000
>> [ 713.115627] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> [ 713.115972] last sysfs file:
>> /sys/devices/virtual/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/brightness
>> [ 713.116137] Modules linked in:
>> [ 713.116137]
>> [ 713.116137] Pid: 1803, comm: ip Not tainted (2.6.31-rc5 #68)
>> [ 713.116137] EIP: 0060:[<c13eecab>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0
>> [ 713.116137] EIP is at register_netdevice+0xab/0x420
>> [ 713.116137] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000001 EDX: 00000001
>> [ 713.116137] ESI: c72c6000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: c61abb54 ESP: c61abb34
>> [ 713.116137] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
>> [ 713.116137] Process ip (pid: 1803, ti=c61aa000 task=c6f395e0
>> task.ti=c61aa000)
>> [ 713.116137] Stack:
>> [ 713.116137] c61abb54 c13f732f 00000001 c61abbb4 894f908a 00000000 c72c6000
>> 00000000
>> [ 713.116137] <0> c61abc74 c13f8278 c61abbb4 00000010 c165d494 c1652090
>> c61abc18 c6f3d028
>> [ 713.116137] <0> 894f908a 894f908a c61abc18 c13f7da0 c61abc74 c13f7f46
>> 00000008 c1546f80
>> [ 713.116137] Call Trace:
>> [ 713.116137] [<c13f732f>] ? rtnl_create_link+0x4f/0x130
>> [ 713.116137] [<c13f8278>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x4d8/0x4e0
>> [ 713.116137] [<c13f7da0>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x0/0x4e0
>> [ 713.116137] [<c13f7f46>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x1a6/0x4e0
>> [ 713.116137] [<c13f7da0>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x0/0x4e0
>> [ 713.116137] [<c13f7d00>] ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x180/0x220
>> [ 713.116137] [<c13f7b80>] ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x220
>> [ 713.116137] [<c1400e56>] ? netlink_rcv_skb+0x86/0xb0
>> [ 713.116137] [<c13f7b5a>] ? rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x50
>>
The problem is, that
ip link add type can
is not possible as you can not create 'real' CAN devices like can0,
can1, ...
To create 'software CAN devices' like vcan0, vcan1, vcan2, ... we use
ip link add type vcan
see drivers/net/can/vcan.c
---
For real hardware CAN devices the netlink interface is only used for the
configuration of already existing interfaces.
From a quick view on the rtnl_newlink() function in
net/core/rtnetlink.c i was not able to find any method to disallow the
creation of interfaces, will say: How can a netlink user provide the
information, that he's not able to create new devices via netlink???
@Patrick: Do you have an idea for this? Is it a new use-case for netlink
that needs to be implemented?
Regards,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-11 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-13954-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-08-11 4:54 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13954] New: Oops in rtnetlink code when creating can device Andrew Morton
2009-08-11 7:52 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2009-08-11 8:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-08-11 9:26 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-08-11 9:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-08-11 9:36 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-08-14 6:23 ` Oliver Hartkopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A812354.8090704@volkswagen.de \
--to=oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de \
--cc=LW@KARO-electronics.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urs.thuermann@volkswagen.de \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).