From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
To: John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
mangoo@wpkg.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x122/0x13a()
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:04:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A84478F.5010808@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250176905.7289.7.camel@Maple>
John Dykstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 16:00 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> BTW, I've seen the same issue in 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 while doing a bunch
>> of NFS-over-UDP testing. I've seen the issue reported in 2.6.27 as well,
>> but it went by ignored. It's not easy to reproduce as it seems like it
>> requires quite a bit traffic over over multiple interfaces.
>
> I've been unable to reproduce it so far. Has bonding always been
> present in the cases you've seen, or are multiple independent interfaces
> sufficient?
Bonding wasn't used in this case, ie. no bonding interfaces were configured.
>
> In the case you reported initially, openvpn was using UDP, but the peer
> was dead, so there presumably wasn't much traffic from that app. Was
> there lots of NFS-over-UDP traffic also going on?
The openvpn case wasn't mine. I didn't use any vpn traffic. Just 2
systems back-to-back with NFS traffic between them.
Yes, there was a lot of NFS over UDP traffic and not much other UDP traffic.
>
> Where was the independent report on 2.6.27
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/22887
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2008/11/26/4244994
-vlad
>
> -- John
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-13 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-03 8:30 WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x122/0x13a() Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-08-04 0:38 ` John Dykstra
2009-08-04 4:20 ` David Miller
2009-08-04 6:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-12 20:00 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-08-13 15:21 ` John Dykstra
2009-08-13 17:04 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2009-08-13 18:16 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-08-04 20:04 ` John Dykstra
2009-08-04 20:35 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A84478F.5010808@hp.com \
--to=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=john.dykstra1@gmail.com \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).