netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: ip_rt_send_redirect() optimization
@ 2009-08-24 16:47 Eric Dumazet
  2009-08-29  6:52 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2009-08-24 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller; +Cc: Linux Netdev List

While doing some forwarding benchmarks, I noticed ip_rt_send_redirect() is rather
expensive, even if send_redirects is false for the device.

Fix is to avoid two atomic ops, we dont really need to take a reference on in_dev

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c |   20 +++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 278f46f..ffad509 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -1514,13 +1514,17 @@ static struct dst_entry *ipv4_negative_advice(struct dst_entry *dst)
 void ip_rt_send_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct rtable *rt = skb_rtable(skb);
-	struct in_device *in_dev = in_dev_get(rt->u.dst.dev);
+	struct in_device *in_dev;
+	int log_martians;
 
-	if (!in_dev)
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(rt->u.dst.dev);
+	if (!in_dev || !IN_DEV_TX_REDIRECTS(in_dev)) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return;
-
-	if (!IN_DEV_TX_REDIRECTS(in_dev))
-		goto out;
+	}
+	log_martians = IN_DEV_LOG_MARTIANS(in_dev);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/* No redirected packets during ip_rt_redirect_silence;
 	 * reset the algorithm.
@@ -1533,7 +1537,7 @@ void ip_rt_send_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	 */
 	if (rt->u.dst.rate_tokens >= ip_rt_redirect_number) {
 		rt->u.dst.rate_last = jiffies;
-		goto out;
+		return;
 	}
 
 	/* Check for load limit; set rate_last to the latest sent
@@ -1547,7 +1551,7 @@ void ip_rt_send_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		rt->u.dst.rate_last = jiffies;
 		++rt->u.dst.rate_tokens;
 #ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE
-		if (IN_DEV_LOG_MARTIANS(in_dev) &&
+		if (log_martians &&
 		    rt->u.dst.rate_tokens == ip_rt_redirect_number &&
 		    net_ratelimit())
 			printk(KERN_WARNING "host %pI4/if%d ignores redirects for %pI4 to %pI4.\n",
@@ -1555,8 +1559,6 @@ void ip_rt_send_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb)
 				&rt->rt_dst, &rt->rt_gateway);
 #endif
 	}
-out:
-	in_dev_put(in_dev);
 }
 
 static int ip_error(struct sk_buff *skb)

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: ip_rt_send_redirect() optimization
  2009-08-24 16:47 [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: ip_rt_send_redirect() optimization Eric Dumazet
@ 2009-08-29  6:52 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2009-08-29  6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: eric.dumazet; +Cc: netdev

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:47:48 +0200

> While doing some forwarding benchmarks, I noticed ip_rt_send_redirect() is rather
> expensive, even if send_redirects is false for the device.
> 
> Fix is to avoid two atomic ops, we dont really need to take a reference on in_dev
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>

Applied, thanks Eric.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-29  6:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-24 16:47 [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: ip_rt_send_redirect() optimization Eric Dumazet
2009-08-29  6:52 ` David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).