From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>,
Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDP multicast packet loss not reported if TX ring overrun?
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:46:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9388B4.8030401@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A931ED3.1090206@gmail.com>
Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Christoph Lameter a écrit :
>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 18:13 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What about ethtool -S ? Does it report any errors?
>>>> Neither. This is is a broadcom bnx2 NIC.
>>> Are you sure the packets are dropped at the sender?
>> Yes I am sending 400k messages from the app and the receiver only gets
>> 341k @300 byte (which is the line rate). There is no way that the 400k get
>> over the line. Also if I reduce SO_SNDBUF then both receiver and
>> sender get down to 341k.
>>
>> I added the output of ethtool -S at the end.
>>
>> The mcast tool can be had from http://gentwo.org/ll or from my directory
>> on www.kernel.org.
>>
>
> # gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.1/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 4.4.1 (GCC)
> # pwd
> /opt/src/lldiag-0.14
> # make
> gcc -Wall -omcast mcast.c -lrt -lm
> mcast.c: In function ‘set_ip’:
> mcast.c:121: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘htons’
> mcast.c: In function ‘build_pattern_array’:
> mcast.c:168: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘htonl’
> /tmp/cc4sYCDr.o: In function `lock':
> mcast.c:(.text+0xcad): undefined reference to `__sync_fetch_and_add_4'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make: *** [mcast] Error 1
>
>
> I have no idea where is defined sync_fetch_and_add
>
Doh...
Dont bother, I had to add "-march=i686" to CFLAGS to get "xadd" support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-25 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-17 20:01 UDP multicast packet loss not reported if TX ring overrun? Christoph Lameter
2009-08-17 20:40 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2009-08-17 20:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-17 21:50 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-08-17 22:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-17 22:43 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-08-17 22:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-17 22:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-18 0:12 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-08-18 0:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-24 17:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-24 22:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-24 22:36 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-08-25 13:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-25 19:03 ` David Stevens
2009-08-25 19:08 ` David Miller
2009-08-25 19:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-25 19:56 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-25 22:35 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-08-26 14:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-26 14:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-26 15:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-26 16:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-26 17:50 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-08-26 19:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-26 22:11 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-08-27 15:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-27 20:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-28 13:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-28 15:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-28 16:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-28 17:26 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] ip: Report qdisc packet drops Eric Dumazet
2009-08-29 6:38 ` David Miller
2009-08-31 12:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-02 1:41 ` David Miller
2009-09-02 14:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-02 16:11 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-09-02 16:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-02 19:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-02 16:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-02 22:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 1:05 ` David Miller
2009-09-03 17:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-03 14:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 18:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-02 18:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-03 1:09 ` David Miller
2009-08-28 19:26 ` UDP multicast packet loss not reported if TX ring overrun? David Miller
2009-08-28 20:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-28 20:04 ` David Miller
2009-08-28 19:24 ` David Miller
2009-08-28 19:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-28 20:03 ` David Miller
2009-08-28 20:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-30 0:21 ` Mark Smith
2009-08-25 13:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-25 13:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-25 14:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-25 15:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-25 15:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-25 15:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-25 16:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-25 16:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-25 16:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-25 16:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-25 17:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-25 17:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-25 17:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-25 17:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-25 18:38 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-08-24 23:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-25 6:46 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-08-25 13:45 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9388B4.8030401@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).