* Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: fix the check for path failure detection [not found] <1251106637-434-1-git-send-email-chunbo.luo@windriver.com> @ 2009-08-25 7:36 ` Wei Yongjun 2009-08-25 8:22 ` Luo Chunbo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Wei Yongjun @ 2009-08-25 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chunbo Luo; +Cc: davem, netdev, linux-sctp, linux-kernel Chunbo Luo wrote: > The transport error count should be incremented when an outstanding > HB is not acknowledged. And the path failure detection should be done > before sending out the HB. > > Signed-off-by: Chunbo Luo <chunbo.luo@windriver.com> > --- > net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 6 +++++- > net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 8 ++++---- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > index 86426aa..fbdf4de 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > @@ -446,7 +446,11 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_association *asoc, > if (transport->state != SCTP_UNCONFIRMED) > asoc->overall_error_count++; > > - if (transport->state != SCTP_INACTIVE && > + /* > + * The transport error count is incremented when an outstanding HB > + * is not acknowledged. > + */ > T3-rtx timer expires also need to increment error count. > + if (transport->hb_sent && transport->state != SCTP_INACTIVE && > (transport->error_count++ >= transport->pathmaxrxt)) { > SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR("transport_strike:association %p", > " transport IP: port:%d failed.\n", > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > index 7288192..7f77099 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > @@ -981,10 +981,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_sendbeat_8_3(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > */ > > if (transport->param_flags & SPP_HB_ENABLE) { > - if (SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM == > - sctp_sf_heartbeat(ep, asoc, type, arg, > - commands)) > - return SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM; > /* Set transport error counter and association error counter > * when sending heartbeat. > */ > @@ -992,6 +988,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_sendbeat_8_3(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > SCTP_TRANSPORT(transport)); > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TRANSPORT_HB_SENT, > SCTP_TRANSPORT(transport)); > + if (SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM == > + sctp_sf_heartbeat(ep, asoc, type, arg, > + commands)) > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM; > } > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_HB_TIMER_UPDATE, > SCTP_TRANSPORT(transport)); > How about this one: diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 86426aa..fb723dd 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_association *asoc, asoc->overall_error_count++; if (transport->state != SCTP_INACTIVE && - (transport->error_count++ >= transport->pathmaxrxt)) { + (transport->error_count >= transport->pathmaxrxt)) { SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR("transport_strike:association %p", " transport IP: port:%d failed.\n", asoc, @@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_association *asoc, * that indicates that we have an outstanding HB. */ if (!is_hb || transport->hb_sent) { + transport->error_count++; transport->last_rto = transport->rto; transport->rto = min((transport->rto * 2), transport->asoc->rto_max); } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: fix the check for path failure detection 2009-08-25 7:36 ` [PATCH v2] sctp: fix the check for path failure detection Wei Yongjun @ 2009-08-25 8:22 ` Luo Chunbo 2009-08-25 13:31 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Luo Chunbo @ 2009-08-25 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wei Yongjun; +Cc: davem, netdev, linux-sctp, linux-kernel On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 15:36 +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote: > Chunbo Luo wrote: > > The transport error count should be incremented when an outstanding > > HB is not acknowledged. And the path failure detection should be done > > before sending out the HB. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chunbo Luo <chunbo.luo@windriver.com> > > --- > > net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 6 +++++- > > net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 8 ++++---- > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > > index 86426aa..fbdf4de 100644 > > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > > @@ -446,7 +446,11 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_association *asoc, > > if (transport->state != SCTP_UNCONFIRMED) > > asoc->overall_error_count++; > > > > - if (transport->state != SCTP_INACTIVE && > > + /* > > + * The transport error count is incremented when an outstanding HB > > + * is not acknowledged. > > + */ > > > > T3-rtx timer expires also need to increment error count. Yes, T3-rtx timer expires need to increment error count. > > > + if (transport->hb_sent && transport->state != SCTP_INACTIVE && > > (transport->error_count++ >= transport->pathmaxrxt)) { > > SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR("transport_strike:association %p", > > " transport IP: port:%d failed.\n", > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > > index 7288192..7f77099 100644 > > --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > > @@ -981,10 +981,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_sendbeat_8_3(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > > */ > > > > if (transport->param_flags & SPP_HB_ENABLE) { > > - if (SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM == > > - sctp_sf_heartbeat(ep, asoc, type, arg, > > - commands)) > > - return SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM; > > /* Set transport error counter and association error counter > > * when sending heartbeat. > > */ > > @@ -992,6 +988,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_sendbeat_8_3(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > > SCTP_TRANSPORT(transport)); > > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TRANSPORT_HB_SENT, > > SCTP_TRANSPORT(transport)); > > + if (SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM == > > + sctp_sf_heartbeat(ep, asoc, type, arg, > > + commands)) > > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM; > > } > > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_HB_TIMER_UPDATE, > > SCTP_TRANSPORT(transport)); > > > > How about this one: It is ok to increment the error count. But the path failure detection should be done before send HB. Otherwise, an extra HB chunk will be sent out before the transport is marked DOWN . So the changes in net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c is also needed. > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > index 86426aa..fb723dd 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_association *asoc, > asoc->overall_error_count++; > > if (transport->state != SCTP_INACTIVE && > - (transport->error_count++ >= transport->pathmaxrxt)) { > + (transport->error_count >= transport->pathmaxrxt)) { > SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR("transport_strike:association %p", > " transport IP: port:%d failed.\n", > asoc, > @@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_association *asoc, > * that indicates that we have an outstanding HB. > */ > if (!is_hb || transport->hb_sent) { > + transport->error_count++; > transport->last_rto = transport->rto; > transport->rto = min((transport->rto * 2), transport->asoc->rto_max); > } > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: fix the check for path failure detection 2009-08-25 8:22 ` Luo Chunbo @ 2009-08-25 13:31 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2009-08-25 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luo Chunbo; +Cc: Wei Yongjun, davem, netdev, linux-sctp, linux-kernel Luo Chunbo wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 15:36 +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote: >> Chunbo Luo wrote: >>> The transport error count should be incremented when an outstanding >>> HB is not acknowledged. And the path failure detection should be done >>> before sending out the HB. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Chunbo Luo <chunbo.luo@windriver.com> >>> --- >>> net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 6 +++++- >>> net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 8 ++++---- >>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>> index 86426aa..fbdf4de 100644 >>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>> @@ -446,7 +446,11 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_association *asoc, >>> if (transport->state != SCTP_UNCONFIRMED) >>> asoc->overall_error_count++; >>> >>> - if (transport->state != SCTP_INACTIVE && >>> + /* >>> + * The transport error count is incremented when an outstanding HB >>> + * is not acknowledged. >>> + */ >>> >> T3-rtx timer expires also need to increment error count. > > Yes, T3-rtx timer expires need to increment error count. > >>> + if (transport->hb_sent && transport->state != SCTP_INACTIVE && >>> (transport->error_count++ >= transport->pathmaxrxt)) { >>> SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR("transport_strike:association %p", >>> " transport IP: port:%d failed.\n", >>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>> index 7288192..7f77099 100644 >>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>> @@ -981,10 +981,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_sendbeat_8_3(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >>> */ >>> >>> if (transport->param_flags & SPP_HB_ENABLE) { >>> - if (SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM == >>> - sctp_sf_heartbeat(ep, asoc, type, arg, >>> - commands)) >>> - return SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM; >>> /* Set transport error counter and association error counter >>> * when sending heartbeat. >>> */ >>> @@ -992,6 +988,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_sendbeat_8_3(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >>> SCTP_TRANSPORT(transport)); >>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TRANSPORT_HB_SENT, >>> SCTP_TRANSPORT(transport)); >>> + if (SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM == >>> + sctp_sf_heartbeat(ep, asoc, type, arg, >>> + commands)) >>> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM; >>> } >>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_HB_TIMER_UPDATE, >>> SCTP_TRANSPORT(transport)); >>> >> How about this one: > > It is ok to increment the error count. But the path failure detection > should be done before send HB. Otherwise, an extra HB chunk will be sent > out before the transport is marked DOWN . So the changes in > net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c is also needed. After running a few simulations with all the different patches from this thread, what we are really after was achieved by the original patch. Looking back over the code history, it looks like this was try to implement the old text of section 8.3 (prior to errata that fixed it). We still have to send HB on an INACTIVE transport to see if it comes back, so that comment of my was entirely wrong. Sorry, don't know what I was thinking at that time... So I'll take the original patch Luo submitted. Thanks -vlad > > > >> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> index 86426aa..fb723dd 100644 >> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_association *asoc, >> asoc->overall_error_count++; >> >> if (transport->state != SCTP_INACTIVE && >> - (transport->error_count++ >= transport->pathmaxrxt)) { >> + (transport->error_count >= transport->pathmaxrxt)) { >> SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR("transport_strike:association %p", >> " transport IP: port:%d failed.\n", >> asoc, >> @@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_association *asoc, >> * that indicates that we have an outstanding HB. >> */ >> if (!is_hb || transport->hb_sent) { >> + transport->error_count++; >> transport->last_rto = transport->rto; >> transport->rto = min((transport->rto * 2), transport->asoc->rto_max); >> } >> >> >> >> >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-25 13:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1251106637-434-1-git-send-email-chunbo.luo@windriver.com>
2009-08-25 7:36 ` [PATCH v2] sctp: fix the check for path failure detection Wei Yongjun
2009-08-25 8:22 ` Luo Chunbo
2009-08-25 13:31 ` Vlad Yasevich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).