From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: UDP multicast packet loss not reported if TX ring overrun? Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:48:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4A93EB9B.5020600@gmail.com> References: <4A89C026.4030402@us.ibm.com> <1250545839.25939.21.camel@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com> <1250549034.25939.30.camel@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com> <1250554332.25939.46.camel@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com> <4A930DEF.5000008@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Sridhar Samudrala , Nivedita Singhvi , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:46228 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750772AbZHYNse (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:48:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christoph Lameter a =E9crit : > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote: >=20 >> NET_XMIT_CN strikes again :) >> >> Well, if ip_local_out() returns a negative error (say -EPERM for exa= mple), >> your patch disables OUTDISCARDS increments. >> >> Maybe a simpler patch like this one ? >=20 > Yes looks good. Can we get this in soon? >=20 Please hold on, I would like to fully understand what's happening, and test the patch :)