From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, benjamin.thery@bull.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netns: embed ip6_dst_ops directly
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:27:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A998F1D.2050705@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090829113449.GA3067@x200.localdomain>
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> struct net::ipv6.ip6_dst_ops is separatedly dynamically allocated,
> but there is no fundamental reason for it. Embed it directly into
> struct netns_ipv6.
>
> For that:
> * move struct dst_ops into separate header to fix circular dependencies
> I honestly tried not to, it's pretty impossible to do other way
> * drop dynamical allocation, allocate together with netns
>
> For a change, remove struct dst_ops::dst_net, it's deducible
> by using container_of() given dst_ops pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> include/net/dst.h | 23 +----------------------
> include/net/dst_ops.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/net/netns/ipv6.h | 3 ++-
> net/ipv6/route.c | 34 +++++++++++++---------------------
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/net/dst.h
> +++ b/include/net/dst.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #ifndef _NET_DST_H
> #define _NET_DST_H
>
> +#include <net/dst_ops.h>
> #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> @@ -102,28 +103,6 @@ struct dst_entry
> };
> };
>
> -
> -struct dst_ops
> -{
> - unsigned short family;
> - __be16 protocol;
> - unsigned gc_thresh;
> -
> - int (*gc)(struct dst_ops *ops);
> - struct dst_entry * (*check)(struct dst_entry *, __u32 cookie);
> - void (*destroy)(struct dst_entry *);
> - void (*ifdown)(struct dst_entry *,
> - struct net_device *dev, int how);
> - struct dst_entry * (*negative_advice)(struct dst_entry *);
> - void (*link_failure)(struct sk_buff *);
> - void (*update_pmtu)(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 mtu);
> - int (*local_out)(struct sk_buff *skb);
> -
> - atomic_t entries;
> - struct kmem_cache *kmem_cachep;
> - struct net *dst_net;
> -};
You will lose entries, kmem_cachep and gc_thresh per namespace, no ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-29 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-29 11:34 [PATCH] netns: embed ip6_dst_ops directly Alexey Dobriyan
2009-08-29 20:27 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2009-09-02 0:44 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A998F1D.2050705@fr.ibm.com \
--to=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=benjamin.thery@bull.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).