From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Fix resource limiting in pfifo_fast
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:54:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9A223D.1060406@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090830062344.6380.16713.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
Krishna Kumar a écrit :
> From: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
>
> pfifo_fast_enqueue has this check:
> if (skb_queue_len(list) < qdisc_dev(qdisc)->tx_queue_len) {
>
> which allows each band to enqueue upto tx_queue_len skbs for a
> total of 3*tx_queue_len skbs. I am not sure if this was the
> intention of limiting in qdisc.
Yes I noticed that and said to myself :
This was to let high priority packets have their own limit,
independent on fact that low priority packets filled their queue.
>
> Patch compiled and 32 simultaneous netperf testing ran fine. Also:
> # tc -s qdisc show dev eth2
> qdisc pfifo_fast 0: root bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> Sent 16835026752 bytes 373116 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 25)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 25
>
> (I am taking next week off, so sorry for any delay in responding)
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> net/sched/sch_generic.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff -ruNp org/net/sched/sch_generic.c new/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> --- org/net/sched/sch_generic.c 2009-08-30 11:18:23.000000000 +0530
> +++ new/net/sched/sch_generic.c 2009-08-30 11:21:50.000000000 +0530
> @@ -432,11 +432,11 @@ static inline struct sk_buff_head *band2
>
> static int pfifo_fast_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc* qdisc)
> {
> - int band = prio2band[skb->priority & TC_PRIO_MAX];
> - struct pfifo_fast_priv *priv = qdisc_priv(qdisc);
> - struct sk_buff_head *list = band2list(priv, band);
> + if (skb_queue_len(&qdisc->q) < qdisc_dev(qdisc)->tx_queue_len) {
> + int band = prio2band[skb->priority & TC_PRIO_MAX];
> + struct pfifo_fast_priv *priv = qdisc_priv(qdisc);
> + struct sk_buff_head *list = band2list(priv, band);
>
> - if (skb_queue_len(list) < qdisc_dev(qdisc)->tx_queue_len) {
> priv->bitmap |= (1 << band);
> qdisc->q.qlen++;
> return __qdisc_enqueue_tail(skb, qdisc, list);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-30 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-30 6:23 [RFC PATCH] sched: Fix resource limiting in pfifo_fast Krishna Kumar
2009-08-30 6:54 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-08-30 7:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-30 8:46 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-08-30 9:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-30 8:22 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-08-31 5:19 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9A223D.1060406@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).