From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc() Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:12:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4A9BBE12.4080206@gmail.com> References: <4A9B7956.40507@gmail.com> <4A9B94B8.4050808@gmail.com> <20090831093019.GI5005@ff.dom.local> <20090831.050220.255723045.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: jarkao2@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:35133 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752384AbZHaMMD (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:12:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090831.050220.255723045.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller a =E9crit : > From: Jarek Poplawski > Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:30:19 +0000 >=20 >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:15:36AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> From: Jarek Poplawski >>> >>> After commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80 >>> (net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx) >>> sk_free() frees socks conditionally and depends >>> on sk_wmem_alloc beeing set e.g. in sock_init_data(). But in some >> Very nice, but I hope David could fix btw. my "beeing" misspelling. >=20 > I will :-) Thanks :)