netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Matt Waddel <Matt.Waddel@freescale.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Tim Sander <tim01@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fec: don't enable irqs in hard irq context
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:14:24 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9F1870.7070408@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251882856-23549-2-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Hi Uwe,

Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> fec_enet_mii, fec_enet_rx and fec_enet_tx are both only called by
> fec_enet_interrupt in interrupt context.  So they must not use
> spin_lock_irq/spin_unlock_irq.
> 
> This fixes:
> 	WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2140 trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x130/0x194()
> 	...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Looks good.

Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>


> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Matt Waddel <Matt.Waddel@freescale.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Tim Sander <tim01@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/fec.c |   12 ++++++------
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
> index ef82606..9c49d56 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fec.c
> @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ fec_enet_tx(struct net_device *dev)
>  	struct	sk_buff	*skb;
>  
>  	fep = netdev_priv(dev);
> -	spin_lock_irq(&fep->hw_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&fep->hw_lock);
>  	bdp = fep->dirty_tx;
>  
>  	while (((status = bdp->cbd_sc) & BD_ENET_TX_READY) == 0) {
> @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ fec_enet_tx(struct net_device *dev)
>  		}
>  	}
>  	fep->dirty_tx = bdp;
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&fep->hw_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&fep->hw_lock);
>  }
>  
>  
> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ fec_enet_rx(struct net_device *dev)
>  	flush_cache_all();
>  #endif
>  
> -	spin_lock_irq(&fep->hw_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&fep->hw_lock);
>  
>  	/* First, grab all of the stats for the incoming packet.
>  	 * These get messed up if we get called due to a busy condition.
> @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ rx_processing_done:
>  	}
>  	fep->cur_rx = bdp;
>  
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&fep->hw_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&fep->hw_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /* called from interrupt context */
> @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ fec_enet_mii(struct net_device *dev)
>  	mii_list_t	*mip;
>  
>  	fep = netdev_priv(dev);
> -	spin_lock_irq(&fep->mii_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&fep->mii_lock);
>  
>  	if ((mip = mii_head) == NULL) {
>  		printk("MII and no head!\n");
> @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ fec_enet_mii(struct net_device *dev)
>  		writel(mip->mii_regval, fep->hwp + FEC_MII_DATA);
>  
>  unlock:
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&fep->mii_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&fep->mii_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static int

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-03  1:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200908311143.08952.tim01@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
2009-08-31 13:22 ` Latest PreemptRT patch error on imx35 Uwe Kleine-König
2009-08-31 15:29   ` Tim Sander
2009-08-31 16:37   ` [PATCH] " Tim Sander
2009-09-02  9:14   ` [PATCH 1/2] fec: fix recursive locking of mii_lock Uwe Kleine-König
2009-09-02  9:14     ` [PATCH 2/2] fec: don't enable irqs in hard irq context Uwe Kleine-König
2009-09-03  1:14       ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2009-09-03  6:17         ` David Miller
2009-09-03  1:16     ` [PATCH 1/2] fec: fix recursive locking of mii_lock Greg Ungerer
2009-09-03  6:17       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A9F1870.7070408@snapgear.com \
    --to=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=Matt.Waddel@freescale.com \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=tim01@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).