From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net_sched 00/07: classful multiqueue dummy scheduler
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:29:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA50ACF.9010400@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA503E4.2060504@gmail.com>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> David Miller a écrit :
>> I gave these patches a very basic bashing with NIU, and it
>> seems to work from what I've tried.
>>
>> I know that Jarek has expressed some questions about the callback
>> scheme used by the new mq classful qdisc, as well as some other
>> issues, but we can refine this using followon patches.
>>
>> For now I'm pushing this out so that it gets wider testing.
>>
>> Thanks everyone!
>
> Very interesting :)
>
> Had very litle time to test this, but got problems very fast, if rate estimator configured.
I didn't test that, but I'll look into it.
> qdisc mq 1: root
> Sent 528702 bytes 3491 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 177925Kbit 49pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> qdisc pfifo 8001: parent 1:1 limit 1000p
> Sent 528702 bytes 3491 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 25400bit 21pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>
> <<<crash>>>
Did you capture the crash?
> (On another term I had a "ping -i 0.1 192.168.20.120" that gave :
>
> 2009/08/07 14:53:42.498 64 bytes from 192.168.20.120: icmp_seq=1982 ttl=64 time=0.126 ms
> 2009/08/07 14:53:42.598 64 bytes from 192.168.20.120: icmp_seq=1983 ttl=64 time=0.118 ms
> 2009/08/07 14:53:42.698 64 bytes from 192.168.20.120: icmp_seq=1984 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms
> 2009/08/07 14:53:42.798 64 bytes from 192.168.20.120: icmp_seq=1985 ttl=64 time=0.123 ms
> 2009/08/07 14:53:42.898 64 bytes from 192.168.20.120: icmp_seq=1986 ttl=64 time=0.126 ms
> 2009/08/07 14:53:42.998 64 bytes from 192.168.20.120: icmp_seq=1987 ttl=64 time=0.119 ms
> 2009/08/07 14:53:43.098 64 bytes from 192.168.20.120: icmp_seq=1988 ttl=64 time=0.122 ms
> 2009/08/07 14:53:43.198 64 bytes from 192.168.20.120: icmp_seq=1989 ttl=64 time=0.119 ms
> 2009/08/07 14:53:43.298 64 bytes from 192.168.20.120: icmp_seq=1990 ttl=64 time=0.117 ms
> 2009/08/07 14:53:43.398 64 bytes from 192.168.20.120: icmp_seq=1991 ttl=64 time=0.117 ms
> ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
Was this also with rate estimators? No buffer space available
indicates that some class/qdisc isn't dequeued or the packets
are leaking, so the output of tc -s -d qdisc show ... might be
helpful.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-07 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-04 16:41 net_sched 00/07: classful multiqueue dummy scheduler Patrick McHardy
2009-09-04 16:41 ` net_sched 01/07: fix class grafting errno codes Patrick McHardy
2009-09-04 16:41 ` net_sched 02/07: make cls_ops->tcf_chain() optional Patrick McHardy
2009-09-05 8:13 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-05 11:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-05 12:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-05 17:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-06 9:06 ` David Miller
2009-09-04 16:41 ` net_sched 03/07: make cls_ops->change and cls_ops->delete optional Patrick McHardy
2009-09-04 16:41 ` net_sched 04/07: remove some unnecessary checks in classful schedulers Patrick McHardy
2009-09-04 16:41 ` net_sched 05/07: reintroduce dev->qdisc for use by sch_api Patrick McHardy
2009-09-06 18:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-07 13:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-07 16:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-04 16:41 ` net_sched 06/07: move dev_graft_qdisc() to sch_generic.c Patrick McHardy
2009-09-04 16:41 ` net_sched 07/07: add classful multiqueue dummy scheduler Patrick McHardy
2009-09-06 20:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-07 13:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-07 18:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-07 19:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-07 19:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-09 16:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-09 19:52 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-10 11:28 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-11 21:38 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-11 22:10 ` David Miller
2009-09-11 22:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-11 22:27 ` David Miller
2009-09-09 16:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-04 16:42 ` net_sched 00/07: " Patrick McHardy
2009-09-07 8:50 ` David Miller
2009-09-07 9:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-09-07 13:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-07 13:29 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-09-07 14:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-07 17:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-07 17:28 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-07 17:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-07 17:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-07 17:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-07 17:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-08 9:31 ` David Miller
2009-09-08 15:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-05 7:27 ` David Miller
2009-09-05 17:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-06 9:01 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AA50ACF.9010400@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).