From: "Philip A. Prindeville" <philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com>
To: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [PATCH] atm/br2684: netif_stop_queue() when atm device busy and netif_wake_queue() when we can send packets again.
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:56:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AAAAB8B.1050304@redfish-solutions.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA97004.2010904@hiramoto.org>
Karl Hiramoto wrote:
> Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>> I had noticed that with my Solos card, and using Qwest 7062/896kb/s
>> service that I was typically only getting ~400kb/s upstream, so I
>> thought that delayed transmitter restarts might be the culprit and
>> decided to try out this patch.
>>
>> I'm running 2.6.27.26, and I modified the patch as below.
>>
>> Has anyone confirmed this patch (Karl's) against 2.6.27?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Philip
> I'd be interested in hearing comparisons with/without the patch. What
> i have is no upstream packet loss with this patch, however slightly
> lower total throughput. I think because the upper networking layers
> take time to restart the packet flow. I'm not really sure if or how
> many packets to upper layers buffer. I haven't had time to debug it
> further.
>
> I don't have a solos card, but you may have to tweak the solos driver
> sk_sndbuf value.
>
> --
> Karl
I'm running with the patch right now... Can't tell if latency has been affected.
Seems to be working a bit better, but I've not done any formalized testing.
-Philip
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-11 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-28 10:38 [PATCH] br2684 testing needed for packet loss and performance Karl Hiramoto
2009-08-28 12:25 ` [Linux-ATM-General] " Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)
2009-08-29 10:24 ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-08-29 11:24 ` [PATCH] atm/br2684: netif_stop_queue() when atm device busy and netif_wake_queue() when we can send packets again Karl Hiramoto
2009-08-31 14:29 ` Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)
2009-09-03 6:27 ` David Miller
2009-09-03 13:44 ` Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)
2009-09-10 19:49 ` [Linux-ATM-General] " Philip A. Prindeville
2009-09-10 21:30 ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-09-11 18:48 ` David Miller
2009-09-15 13:44 ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-09-15 14:57 ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-09-16 18:04 ` Philip A. Prindeville
2009-09-11 19:56 ` Philip A. Prindeville [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AAAAB8B.1050304@redfish-solutions.com \
--to=philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com \
--cc=karl@hiramoto.org \
--cc=linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).