From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] IPv6: 6rd tunnel mode Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:57:30 +0900 Message-ID: <4AC1A1CA.3090808@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20090922003956.GA19947@lnxos.staff.proxad.net> <4AB838F1.1090704@hp.com> <1253602772.17175.13.camel@lnxos-dev> <4AC196FB.4060408@linux-ipv6.org> <4AC19CD1.6060600@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: acassen@freebox.fr, Brian Haley , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Townsley Return-path: Received: from 94.43.138.210.xn.2iij.net ([210.138.43.94]:45396 "EHLO mail.st-paulia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750721AbZI2F5i (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:57:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4AC19CD1.6060600@cisco.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: So, you mean, just in case if there are any IPRs? --yoshfuji Mark Townsley wrote: > This is a general problem with all rfc editor submissions right now. It's not > because there is any IPR on the mechanism itself. > > This is the current standards track version: > > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-ipv6-6rd-00.txt > > We are updating it now based on some discussions, should be published in a week > or so. Mostly minor updates. We are working with Remi closely on all of this. > > This is the latest of Remi's independent drafts: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-despres-6rd-03 > > - Mark > > YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Alexandre Cassen wrote: >> >> >>>> I couldn't find RFC 5569 (delayed due to IPR rights?), although I did find >>>> the latest 6rd draft, -03. It was showing as Informational, not Standards >>>> track, is that right? Just curious. >>>> >>> In fact there is currently two draft : >>> >>> 1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-despres-6rd/ >>> >>> This draft is targeting informational RFC as an independent >>> submission. It is currently queued and has been delayed since may for >>> IPR. >>> >> >> Do you have any pointer about this (IPR)? >> I probably missed something but I could not find any >> information in IETF IPR page... >> >> --yoshfuji >> >> >