netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"billfink@mindspring.com" <billfink@mindspring.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netconf notes and materials
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:35:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACFC8AA.7010902@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1255129289.8937.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 14:51 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> 
>>From: Bill Fink <billfink@mindspring.com>
>>Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:49:49 -0400
>>
>>
>>>How did you do the NUMA memory performance monitoring that was
>>>presented on one of your slides?
>>
>>Using proprietary internal tools Intel is unlikely to release.
>>
>>On the bright side, some of those metrics will make their way into the
>>'perf' facilities in the kernel so they can be monitored, but not all
>>of them.
> 
> 
> Yes, they are tools written by our CPU and chipset teams to assist in
> debug.  To reinforce what David just said, I know Jesse Barnes is
> working hard with the Intel powers-that-be to get the "approved" public
> PMU counters into the perf utility.  I'd imagine the PMU counters for
> IOH memory throughput will be deemed ok, since it's not uncovering any
> IP.
> 
> If I hear anything about any of the performance counters, I'll be sure
> to forward that on.

 From the standpoint of I/O, anything that might enable a port of:

http://pcitop.berlios.de/

would be goodness.

rick jones

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-09 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-07 11:47 netconf notes and materials David Miller
2009-10-09 21:49 ` Bill Fink
2009-10-09 21:51   ` David Miller
2009-10-09 23:01     ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-10-09 23:31       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-10-09 23:35       ` Rick Jones [this message]
2010-11-07 19:06 ` Rami Rosen
2010-11-08  1:53   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ACFC8AA.7010902@hp.com \
    --to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=billfink@mindspring.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).