From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Cc: e1000-list <e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
"gospo@redhat.com" <gospo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: behaviour question for igb on nehalem box
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:32:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD4B9BB.3010209@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ACFCBE8.7060108@intel.com>
On 10/09/2009 05:48 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> The odds of any 2 flows overlapping when you are only using 4 flows is
> pretty high, especially if the addresses/ports are close in range. You
> typically need something on the order of about 16 flows over a wide
> range of port numbers in order to get a good distribution.
Yes, I realize this. However, I was surprised that we were seeing the
packet count increasing for only one queue but the interrupt count
increasing for more than one.
Also, if we really crank up the traffic levels the box apparently
panics. They're working on getting a serial cable hooked up to it to
get the debug information, so I don't really have much information on
that part just yet.
We're going to try the out-of-tree drivers. Unfortunately it appears
that the out-of-tree igb driver doesn't compile for this kernel. I
suspect the compat code needs tweaking.
Chris
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-09 18:43 behaviour question for igb on nehalem box Chris Friesen
2009-10-09 20:22 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2009-10-09 22:31 ` Chris Friesen
2009-10-09 23:20 ` Alexander Duyck
2009-10-09 23:48 ` Alexander Duyck
2009-10-13 17:32 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2009-10-16 22:15 ` Richard Scobie
2009-10-16 22:48 ` [E1000-devel] " Brandeburg, Jesse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD4B9BB.3010209@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).