From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is missing counter update
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD84D8B.5020103@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0910161137490.3886@u.domain.uli>
Julian Anastasov a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
>>> This will need little change in inet_csk_reqsk_queue_prune()
>>> but it saves SYN-ACK traffic during deferring period in the
>>> common case when client sends ACK. If such compromise is
>>> acceptable I can prepare and test some patch.
>> I would personally like this a lot ! This will satisfy people who
>> expect it to establish at the end of the "TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT delay"
>> as can be interpreted from the man page, will reduce the number of
>> useless SYN-ACKs that annoy other people while still making no
>> visible change for anyone who would rely on the current behaviour.
>
> OK, I don't have much time now, this is what I'm
> going to test later today and later can provide proper comments:
>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
I tested both patches and they perform very well, thank you !
For the minimum 1 sec value, tcpdump looks like :
12:32:03.850456 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.2222: S 1879889239:1879889239(0) win 32792 <mss 16396,nop,nop,timestamp 952803 0,nop,wscale 6>
12:32:03.850463 IP 127.0.0.1.2222 > 127.0.0.1.20000: S 1890330616:1890330616(0) ack 1879889240 win 32768 <mss 16396,nop,nop,timestamp 952803 952803,nop,wscale 6>
12:32:03.850469 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.2222: . ack 1 win 513 <nop,nop,timestamp 952803 952803>
12:32:06.849989 IP 127.0.0.1.2222 > 127.0.0.1.20000: S 1890330616:1890330616(0) ack 1879889240 win 32768 <mss 16396,nop,nop,timestamp 955803 952803,nop,wscale 6>
12:32:06.849996 IP 127.0.0.1.20000 > 127.0.0.1.2222: . ack 1 win 513 <nop,nop,timestamp 955803 955803>
So listening application gets the accept() 3 seconds after initial SYN
# ss -emoian | grep SYN-RECV
SYN-RECV 0 0 127.0.0.1:2222 127.0.0.1:20000 timer:(on,24sec,4) ino:0 sk:f6f0ec80
I wonder if tcp_diag should be extented a bit to reflect fact that the ACK was received from client
(ie forward the inet_rsk(req)->acked information to idiag_rqueue)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
index cb73fde..c172bd4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static int inet_diag_fill_req(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
r->id.idiag_src[0] = ireq->loc_addr;
r->id.idiag_dst[0] = ireq->rmt_addr;
r->idiag_expires = jiffies_to_msecs(tmo);
- r->idiag_rqueue = 0;
+ r->idiag_rqueue = ireq->acked;
r->idiag_wqueue = 0;
r->idiag_uid = sock_i_uid(sk);
r->idiag_inode = 0;
->
# ss -emoian | grep SYN-RECV
SYN-RECV 1 0 127.0.0.1:2222 127.0.0.1:20000 timer:(on,24sec,4) ino:0 sk:f6f0ec80
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-16 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-13 5:07 TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is missing counter update Willy Tarreau
2009-10-13 7:11 ` David Miller
2009-10-13 7:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-13 7:27 ` David Miller
2009-10-13 21:27 ` Julian Anastasov
2009-10-14 4:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-14 7:27 ` Julian Anastasov
2009-10-14 20:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-14 21:12 ` Olaf van der Spek
2009-10-14 22:43 ` David Miller
2009-10-15 6:08 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-15 8:47 ` Julian Anastasov
2009-10-15 12:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-15 22:44 ` Julian Anastasov
2009-10-16 3:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-16 5:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-16 5:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-16 6:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-16 6:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-16 7:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-16 7:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-16 5:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-16 8:49 ` Julian Anastasov
2009-10-16 10:40 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-10-16 19:27 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-17 11:48 ` Julian Anastasov
2009-10-17 12:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-17 14:20 ` Julian Anastasov
2009-10-19 20:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-19 20:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-19 20:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20 2:23 ` David Miller
2009-10-15 7:59 ` Julian Anastasov
2009-10-16 10:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2009-10-13 7:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-13 7:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-10-13 8:08 ` Olaf van der Spek
2009-10-13 8:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-13 8:35 ` David Miller
2009-10-13 7:35 ` David Miller
2009-10-13 8:12 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD84D8B.5020103@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).