From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
mostrows@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:36:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADC5D3B.8010006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6d1cecd0910182034t9d24859mc6f392875b36ad17@mail.gmail.com>
Michal Ostrowski a écrit :
> Here's my theory on this after an inital look...
>
> Looking at the oops report and disassembly of the actual module binary
> that caused the oops, one can deduce that:
>
> Execution was in pppoe_flush_dev(). %ebx contained the pointer "struct
> pppox_sock *po", which is what we faulted on, excuting "cmp %eax, 0x190(%ebx)".
> %ebx value was 0xffffffff (hence we got "NULL pointer dereference at 0x18f").
>
> At this point "i" (stored in %esi) is 15 (valid), meaning that we got a value
> of 0xffffffff in pn->hash_table[i].
>
>>From this I'd hypothesize that the combination of dev_put() and release_sock()
> may have allowed us to free "pn". At the bottom of the loop we alreayd
> recognize that since locks are dropped we're responsible for handling
> invalidation of objects, and perhaps that should be extended to "pn" as well.
> --
> Michal Ostrowski
> mostrows@gmail.com
>
>
Looking at this stuff, I do believe flush_lock protection is not
properly done.
At the end of pppoe_connect() for example we can find :
err_put:
if (po->pppoe_dev) {
dev_put(po->pppoe_dev);
po->pppoe_dev = NULL;
}
This is done without any protection, and can therefore clash with
pppoe_flush_dev() :
spin_lock(&flush_lock);
po->pppoe_dev = NULL; /* ppoe_dev can already be NULL before this point */
spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
dev_put(dev); /* oops */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-19 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-18 21:02 kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-19 3:34 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-19 11:36 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-19 12:01 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-19 12:36 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-10-19 13:19 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-19 15:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-19 16:05 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-19 17:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-19 18:07 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-19 18:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-19 19:29 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-19 20:54 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-20 3:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20 5:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 5:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20 5:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 6:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-19 20:57 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-19 21:22 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-20 0:08 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 3:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 11:36 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 11:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 11:52 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 13:42 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 13:50 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 13:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 14:20 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 14:23 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 19:08 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-23 15:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-25 18:10 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 2:28 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ADC5D3B.8010006@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mostrows@earthlink.net \
--cc=mostrows@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).