From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is missing counter update Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:17:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4ADCC95C.8030401@gmail.com> References: <20091015124134.GB1073@1wt.eu> <20091016050310.GA5574@1wt.eu> <4AD84D8B.5020103@gmail.com> <4AD9B37A.3090606@gmail.com> <4ADCC58B.2060408@gmail.com> <20091019201122.GC21437@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Julian Anastasov , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Willy Tarreau Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:49653 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752315AbZJSUSH (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:18:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20091019201122.GC21437@1wt.eu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Willy Tarreau a =E9crit : > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:01:15PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> David, I think we should revert 6d01a026b7d3009a418326bdcf313503a314= f1ea >> (tcp: fix tcp_defer_accept to consider the timeout)=20 >> since we know its broken. >=20 > yes I agree with Eric, please revert it and wait for Julian's > patch which gets it right. Sorry for the wrong fix, at least > it will have brought the discussion on the table, but without > a faulty patch it would have been better :-/ >=20 Thanks again Willy, we made progress and this is nice :)