netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix IP_MULTICAST_IF
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:16:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADD3982.2040100@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADD3794.8030906@gmail.com>

Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:41:58 +0200
>>
>>> ipv4/ipv6 setsockopt(IP_MULTICAST_IF) have dubious __dev_get_by_index() calls.
>> Dubious, how so?
>>
>> Yes, I know RTNL/dev_base_lock, but it's not using what it gets
>> back at all.
>>
>> It's testing existence, a boolean, it doesn't dereference the
>> 'dev' it gets back at all.
>>
>> This code is intentional and perfectly fine.
> 
> If this was intentional, something changed and made the prereq false.
> 
> Final target might be fine, but an element in the chain, before target
> could be deleted while reader scans hash chain.
> 

BTW, even an insertion can crash a lockless reader, since reader could see a corrupt
 n->next (hlist_add_head() has no barrier between n->next = first and h->first = n;)

static inline void hlist_add_head(struct hlist_node *n, struct hlist_head *h)
{
        struct hlist_node *first = h->first;
        n->next = first;
        if (first)
                first->pprev = &n->next;
        h->first = n;
        n->pprev = &h->first;
}


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-20  4:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-19 16:41 [PATCH] net: Fix IP_MULTICAST_IF Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20  3:59 ` David Miller
2009-10-20  4:07   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20  4:16     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-10-20  4:21       ` David Miller
2009-10-20  4:20     ` David Miller
2009-10-20  4:23       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20  4:28         ` David Miller
2009-10-20  5:03           ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Introduce dev_get_by_index_rcu() Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20  5:06             ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-20  5:18               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29  8:43                 ` David Miller
2009-10-20 12:35           ` [PATCH] ifb: should not use __dev_get_by_index() without locks Eric Dumazet
2009-10-23  4:54             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ADD3982.2040100@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).