From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@codefidence.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ori@comsleep.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Per route TCP options
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:44:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADDDAFB.5040600@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256052161-14156-1-git-send-email-gilad@codefidence.com>
Gilad Ben-Yossef a écrit :
> Turn the global sysctls allowing disabling of TCP SACK, DSCAK,
> time stamp and window scale into per route entry feature options,
> laying the ground to future removal of the relevant global sysctls.
>
> You really only want to disable SACK, DSACK, time stamp or window
> scale if you've got a piece of broken networking equipment somewhere
> as a stop gap until you can bring a big enough hammer to deal with
> the broken network equipment. It doesn't make sense to "punish" the
> entire connections going through the machine to destinations not
> related to the broken equipment.
>
> This is doubly true when you're dealing with network containers
> used to isolate several virtual domains.
>
> Per route options implemented in free bits in the features route
> entry property, which in some cases were reserved by name for these
> options, so this does not inflate any structure and I expect that
> when the apropriate global sysctls will be removed the overall code
> base will be smaller.
>
> Tested on x86 using Qemu/KVM.
>
> Will send the matching patch to iproute2 if/when this is ACKed or
> if someone wants to test this.
>
> Patchset based on original work by Ori Finkelman and Yoni Amit
> from ComSleep Ltd.
>
> Gilad Ben-Yossef (8):
> Only parse time stamp TCP option in time wait sock
> Allow tcp_parse_options to consult dst entry
> Infrastructure for querying route entry features
> Add the no SACK route option feature
> Allow disabling TCP timestamp options per route
> Allow to turn off TCP window scale opt per route
> Allow disabling of DSACK TCP option per route
> Document future removal of sysctl_tcp_* options
>
Interesting... But you should give numbers to your patches so that we know their order
You could also do the ECN part for consistency (ie RTAX_FEATURE_ECN -> RTAX_FEATURE_NO_ECN)
And please post iproute2 patches as well :)
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-20 15:22 [PATCH RFC] Per route TCP options Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC] Only parse time stamp TCP option in time wait sock Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC] Allow tcp_parse_options to consult dst entry Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC] Add dst_feature to query route entry features Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC] Add the no SACK route option feature Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC] Allow disabling TCP timestamp options per route Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC] Allow to turn off TCP window scale opt " Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC] Allow disabling of DSACK TCP option " Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC] Document future removal of sysctl_tcp_* options Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-21 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC] Allow to turn off TCP window scale opt per route Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-21 8:18 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 15:44 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-10-20 16:11 ` [PATCH RFC] Per route TCP options Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 18:53 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2009-10-21 8:15 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-20 16:26 ` Rick Jones
2009-10-21 8:04 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-21 8:21 ` Florian Westphal
2009-10-21 8:40 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-21 0:36 ` David Miller
2009-10-21 8:10 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2009-10-21 2:13 ` Bill Fink
2009-10-21 8:27 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ADDDAFB.5040600@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gilad@codefidence.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ori@comsleep.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).