From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gilad Ben-Yossef Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Per route TCP options Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:10:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4ADEC1FE.1090209@codefidence.com> References: <1256052161-14156-1-git-send-email-gilad@codefidence.com> <20091020.173653.193717720.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ori@comsleep.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from xenbox.codefidence.com ([92.48.73.16]:43920 "EHLO xenbox.codefidence.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751918AbZJUIKi (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:10:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20091020.173653.193717720.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > When sending more than one patch in a patch set, you must > number your patches so that people know in what order your > pathes should be applied. > > Mailing lists and other entities reorder list postings > quite severely, so it's not "obvious" what order your > postings matter just based upon arrival order. > > Yes, of course. How silly of me not to notice. My apologies. git and I are currently have a bit of love hate thing going on... I will re-send the patch set in a more favorable form. Thanks, Gilad -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker & CTO Codefidence Ltd. Web: http://codefidence.com Cell: +972-52-8260388 Skype: gilad_codefidence Tel: +972-8-9316883 ext. 201 Fax: +972-8-9316884 Email: gilad@codefidence.com Check out our Open Source technology and training blog - http://tuxology.net "Sorry cannot parse this, its too long to be true :)" -- Eric Dumazet on netdev mailing list