From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gilad Ben-Yossef Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] Document future removal of sysctl_tcp_* options Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:23:21 +0200 Message-ID: <4ADEE119.7020803@codefidence.com> References: <1256115421-12714-1-git-send-email-gilad@codefidence.com> <1256115421-12714-9-git-send-email-gilad@codefidence.com> <4ADED6FA.2030502@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ori@comsleep.com To: William Allen Simpson Return-path: Received: from xenbox.codefidence.com ([92.48.73.16]:42579 "EHLO xenbox.codefidence.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752730AbZJUKXV (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:23:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4ADED6FA.2030502@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: William Allen Simpson wrote: > Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: >> +What: sysctl_tcp_sack, sysctl_tcp_timestamps, >> sysctl_tcp_window_scaling, >> + sysctl_tcp_dsack > > Opposed to removing, as this is a common configuration for *BSD. It > helps > operators to have similar utility across systems. > > net.inet.tcp.sack.enable > > net.inet.tcp.timestamps > > net.inet.tcp.win_scale > > Support removing sysctl_tcp_dsack, as this appears to be Linux-only. I have no issue with leaving those, if everyone thinks we're better off. BTW, while we're talking about OS envy, I do believe that Windows do let you specify on a per route basis. Not that this is really a good ground for technical decision, but still... :-) Gilad -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker & CTO Codefidence Ltd. Web: http://codefidence.com Cell: +972-52-8260388 Skype: gilad_codefidence Tel: +972-8-9316883 ext. 201 Fax: +972-8-9316884 Email: gilad@codefidence.com Check out our Open Source technology and training blog - http://tuxology.net "Sorry cannot parse this, its too long to be true :)" -- Eric Dumazet on netdev mailing list