From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@lhnet.ca>
Cc: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@ixiacom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: allow netdev_wait_allrefs() to run faster
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:54:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADF670F.1010200@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091021165139.GL877@kvack.org>
Benjamin LaHaise a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:40:07PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Ben patch only address interface deletion, and one part of the problem,
>> maybe the more visible one for the current kernel.
>
> The first part I've been tackling has been the overhead in procfs, sysctl
> and sysfs. I've got patches for some of the issues, hacks for others, and
> should have something to post in a few days. Getting rid of those overheads
> is enough to get to decent interface creation times for the first 20 or 30k
> interfaces.
>
> On the interface deletion side of things, within the network code, fib_hash
> has a few linear scans that really start hurting. trie is a bit better,
> but I haven't started digging too deeply into its flush/remove overhead yet,
> aside from noticing that trie has a linear scan if
> CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH is set since it sets the hash size to 1.
> fn_trie_flush() is currently the worst offender during deletion.
Well, there are many things to change...
# ip -o link | wc -l
13097
# time ip -o link show mv22248
13045: mv22248@eth3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN \ link/ether 00:1e:0b:8e:c8:08 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
real 0m0.840s
user 0m0.473s
sys 0m0.368s
almost one second to get link status of one particular interface :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-21 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-17 22:18 [PATCH/RFC] make unregister_netdev() delete more than 4 interfaces per second Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-18 4:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-18 16:13 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-18 17:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-18 18:21 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-18 19:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-21 12:39 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-21 15:40 ` [PATCH] net: allow netdev_wait_allrefs() to run faster Eric Dumazet
2009-10-21 16:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-21 16:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-21 19:54 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-10-29 23:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-29 23:38 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-30 1:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-30 14:35 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-30 14:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-30 23:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-30 23:53 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-31 0:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-09 17:23 ` Ben Greear
2010-08-09 17:34 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2010-08-09 17:44 ` Ben Greear
2010-08-09 17:48 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2010-08-09 18:03 ` Ben Greear
2010-08-09 19:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-09 21:03 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2010-08-09 21:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-21 16:55 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-23 21:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24 4:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24 5:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24 8:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24 14:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24 14:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24 23:49 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-25 4:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-25 8:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-25 15:19 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-25 19:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24 20:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ADF670F.1010200@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=bcrl@lhnet.ca \
--cc=cratiu@ixiacom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).