From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
isdn4linux <isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de>,
i4ldeveloper <i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de>,
Karsten Keil <isdn@linux-pingi.de>
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:37:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE0ECCE.2020407@imap.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADF5710.4030505@imap.cc>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1719 bytes --]
On 21.10.2009 20:46, /me wrote:
>>>> I have encountered the message in the subject during a test of
>>>> the Gigaset CAPI driver, and would like to determine whether
>>>> it's a bug in the driver, a bug somewhere else, or no bug at
>>>> all. The test scenario was PPP over ISDN with pppd+capiplugin.
>>>> In an alternative scenario, also PPP over ISDN but with
>>>> smpppd+capidrv, the message did not occur.
>
> I'm sorry, I had confused the two cases. The message occurs in
> the smpppd+capidrv scenario, not with pppd+capiplugin.
>
>>>> Johannes' answer pointed me to the netif_rx() function.
>>>> The Gigaset driver itself doesn't call that function at all.
>>>> In the scenario where I saw the message, it was the SYNC_PPP
>>>> line discipline that did.
>
> This analysis was therefore wrong. It would be the netif_rx()
> call towards the end of isdn_ppp_push_higher() in
> drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c L1177.
Having noticed that, I cooked up the following patch which fixed
the messages for me. Comments? (Adding i4l people to the already
impressive CC list.)
--- a/drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c
@@ -1174,7 +1174,10 @@ isdn_ppp_push_higher(isdn_net_dev * net_dev, isdn_net_local * lp, struct sk_buff
#endif /* CONFIG_IPPP_FILTER */
skb->dev = dev;
skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
- netif_rx(skb);
+ if (in_interrupt())
+ netif_rx(skb);
+ else
+ netif_rx_ni(skb);
/* net_dev->local->stats.rx_packets++; done in isdn_net.c */
return;
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-22 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091011095217.GA2200@darkstar>
[not found] ` <1255255735.4095.53.camel@johannes.local>
[not found] ` <4AD1BF06.3050103@phoenixsoftware.de>
[not found] ` <1255261251.4095.143.camel@johannes.local>
2009-10-12 8:28 ` NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12 10:32 ` David Miller
2009-10-12 11:25 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-15 11:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 17:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 18:46 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:19 ` [PATCH] net: Adjust softirq raising in __napi_schedule Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:25 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-21 21:37 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-22 8:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:39 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:46 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-26 7:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-26 7:58 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 8:47 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-26 8:56 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-27 0:52 ` Tilman Schmidt
[not found] ` <4AE64441.7060008-ZTO5kqT2PaM@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-27 7:01 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-22 11:29 ` David Miller
2009-10-22 12:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-22 23:37 ` Tilman Schmidt [this message]
2009-10-23 13:34 ` NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:27 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:31 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 16:33 ` Tilman Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE0ECCE.2020407@imap.cc \
--to=tilman@imap.cc \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=isdn@linux-pingi.de \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).