netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@ixiacom.com>
Cc: opurdila@ixiacom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: udp: break from the lookup when hitting the maximum score value
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:57:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE1E07C.5030502@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910231936.16022.lgrijincu@ixiacom.com>

Lucian Adrian Grijincu a écrit :
> Before udp hashes were converted to rcu in
> 	udp: introduce struct udp_table and multiple spinlocks
> 	645ca708f936b2fbeb79e52d7823e3eb2c0905f8
> we stopped searching in list upon hitting the maximum score value (which is 
> 9).
> 
> This got removed in the conversion to rcu.
> I'm not sure whether this was intentional or it just slipped by.
> 
> As far as I understand it this does not interfere with the lockless rcu: there 
> is another score check the result will have to pass and if it doesn't have a 
> score of 9 (which will be the value of badness) we'll just restart the lookup.
> 
> Even if the node was deleted from the chain and reclaimed at a later time, if 
> at the second score test we have value 9 again, we can still return with this 
> result.
> 
> Am I missing something?
> 
> 

This was intentional.

This never happens in practice and slowdown lookups.

(To reach score 9, your UDP socket must be connected, and bound to a device)
Most developpers dont even know UDP socket can be connected...

We added large hashtables in commit f86dcc5aa8c7908f2c287e7a211228df599e3e71
(udp: dynamically size hash tables at boot time), so average chain length should
be small anyway...




      reply	other threads:[~2009-10-23 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-23 16:36 udp: break from the lookup when hitting the maximum score value Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2009-10-23 16:57 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AE1E07C.5030502@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgrijincu@ixiacom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).