From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMIC failures V2 Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:48:19 +0300 Message-ID: <4AE2A333.6060307@cs.helsinki.fi> References: <1256221356-26049-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <84144f020910220747nba30d8bkc83c2569da79bd7c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mel Gorman , Frans Pop , Jiri Kosina , Sven Geggus , Karol Lewandowski , Tobias Oetiker , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , David Miller , Reinette Chatre , Kalle Valo , David Rientjes , KOSAKI Motohiro , Mohamed Abbas , Jens Axboe , "John W. Linville" , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Stephan von Krawczynski , Kernel Testers List , netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, " \" , akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, torvalds@l To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> These are pretty obvious bug fixes and should go to linux-next ASAP IMHO. Christoph Lameter wrote: > Bug fixes go into main not linux-next. Lets make sure these fixes really > work and then merge. Regardless, patches 1-2 and should _really_ go to Linus' tree (and eventually -stable) while we figure out the rest of the problems. They fix obvious regressions in the code paths and we have reports from people that they help. Yes, they don't fix everything for everyone but we there's no upside in holding back fixes that are simple one line fixes to regressions. Pekka