From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Petlund <apetlund@simula.no>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
shemminger@vyatta.com, ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: TCP thin-stream detection
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:09:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE7B5D6.8070001@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE72075.4070702@simula.no>
Andreas Petlund wrote:
> +/* Determines whether this is a thin stream (which may suffer from
> + * increased latency). Used to trigger latency-reducing mechanisms.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned int tcp_stream_is_thin(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
> +{
> + return tp->packets_out < 4;
> +}
> +
This bothers me a bit. Having just looked at your Linux presentation,
and not (yet) read your papers, it seems much of your justification was
with 1 packet per RTT. Here, you seem to be concentrating on 4, probably
because many implementations quickly ramp up to 4.
But there's a fair amount of experience showing that ramping to 4 is
problematic on congested paths, especially wireless networks. Fast
retransmit in that case would be disastrous.
Once upon a time, I worked on a fair number of interactive games a decade
or so ago. And agree that this can be a problem, although I've never
been a fan of turning off the Nagle algorithm. My solution has always
been a heartbeat, rather than trying to shoehorn this into TCP.
Also, I've not seen any discussion on the end-to-end interest list.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 16:31 [PATCH 1/3] net: TCP thin-stream detection Andreas Petlund
2009-10-28 3:09 ` William Allen Simpson [this message]
2009-10-29 13:51 ` Andreas Petlund
2009-10-29 16:32 ` Arnd Hannemann
2009-10-29 20:26 ` Ilpo Järvinen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-30 13:53 apetlund
2009-10-30 15:24 ` Arnd Hannemann
2009-11-05 13:34 ` Andreas Petlund
2009-11-05 13:45 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2009-11-09 15:24 ` Andreas Petlund
2009-10-30 15:23 apetlund
2009-10-30 16:13 ` William Allen Simpson
2009-11-05 13:36 ` Andreas Petlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE7B5D6.8070001@gmail.com \
--to=william.allen.simpson@gmail.com \
--cc=apetlund@simula.no \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).