From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Multicast packet reassembly can fail
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:18:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE81A70.5060307@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256683583.3153.389.camel@linux-1lbu>
Steve Chen a écrit :
> Multicast packet reassembly can fail
>
> When multicast connections with multiple fragments are received by the same
> node from more than one Ethernet ports, race condition between fragments
> from each Ethernet port can cause fragment reassembly to fail leading to
> packet drop. This is because packets from each Ethernet port appears identical
> to the the code that reassembles the Ethernet packet.
>
> The solution is evaluate the Ethernet interface number in addition to all other
> parameters so that every packet can be uniquely identified. The existing
> iif field in struct ipq is now used to generate the hash key, and iif is also
> used for comparison in case of hash collision.
>
> Please note that q->saddr ^ (q->iif << 5) is now being passed into
> ipqhashfn to generate the hash key. This is borrowed from the routing
> code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Huth <mhuth@mvista.com>
>
This makes no sense to me, but I need to check the code.
How interface could matter in IP defragmentation ?
And why multicast is part of the equation ?
If defrag fails, this must be for other reason,
and probably needs another fix.
Check line 219 of net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* With SMP race we have to recheck hash table, because
* such entry could be created on other cpu, while we
* promoted read lock to write lock.
*/
hlist_for_each_entry(qp, n, &f->hash[hash], list) {
if (qp->net == nf && f->match(qp, arg)) {
atomic_inc(&qp->refcnt);
write_unlock(&f->lock);
qp_in->last_in |= INET_FRAG_COMPLETE; <<< HERE >>>
inet_frag_put(qp_in, f);
return qp;
}
}
#endif
I really wonder why we set INET_FRAG_COMPLETE here
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 22:46 [PATCH] Multicast packet reassembly can fail Steve Chen
2009-10-27 23:22 ` Rick Jones
2009-10-28 13:29 ` Steve Chen
2009-10-28 16:55 ` Mark Huth
2009-10-28 17:18 ` Rick Jones
2009-10-28 17:50 ` Steve Chen
2009-10-28 18:10 ` Rick Jones
2009-10-28 18:40 ` Steve Chen
2009-10-29 18:04 ` Herbert Xu
2009-10-29 18:33 ` Steve Chen
2009-11-02 18:36 ` Steve Chen
2009-10-28 10:18 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-10-28 13:32 ` Steve Chen
2009-10-28 13:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29 4:57 ` David Miller
2009-10-29 5:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28 20:12 ` David Stevens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE81A70.5060307@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schen@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).