netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Petlund <apetlund@simula.no>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	shemminger@vyatta.com, ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: TCP thin linear timeouts
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:58:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE83FE4.1050309@nets.rwth-aachen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE7262B.1060703@gmail.com>

Eric Dumazet schrieb:
> Andreas Petlund a écrit :
>> This patch will make TCP use only linear timeouts if the stream is thin. This will help to avoid the very high latencies that thin stream suffer because of exponential backoff. This mechanism is only active if enabled by iocontrol or syscontrol and the stream is identified as thin.
>>
> 
> Wont this reduce the session timeout to something very small, ie 15 retransmits, way under the minute ?

The session timeout no longer depends on the actual number of retransmits. Instead its a time interval,
which is roughly equivalent to the time a TCP, performing exponential backoff would need to perform
15 retransmits.

However, addressing the proposal:
I wonder how one can seriously suggest to just skip congestion response during timeout-based
loss recovery? I believe that in a heavily congested scenarios, this would lead to a goodput
goodput disaster... Not to mention that in a heavily congested scenario, suddenly every flow
will become "thin", so this will even amplify the problems. Or did I miss something?

Best regards,
Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-28 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-27 16:31 [PATCH 2/3] net: TCP thin linear timeouts Andreas Petlund
2009-10-27 16:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28 12:58   ` Arnd Hannemann [this message]
2009-10-28 14:31     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2009-10-29 13:51       ` Andreas Petlund
2009-10-29 14:24         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29 17:01         ` Rick Jones
     [not found]     ` <07CD1135-C68B-4264-8CD3-C4BC0400FDA2@simula.no>
2009-10-29 16:11       ` Arnd Hannemann
2009-10-28  3:20 ` William Allen Simpson
2009-10-29 13:50   ` Andreas Petlund
2009-10-28 14:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-29 15:14 apetlund
2009-10-29 15:19 apetlund
2009-10-29 15:43 apetlund
2009-10-29 15:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29 20:52 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2009-10-29 16:54 apetlund
2009-10-30 10:48 apetlund
2009-10-30 17:33 ` Rick Jones
2009-10-30 18:11   ` William Allen Simpson
2009-11-05 13:37     ` Andreas Petlund
2009-10-30 15:27 apetlund

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AE83FE4.1050309@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
    --to=hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
    --cc=apetlund@simula.no \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).