From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iproute uses too small of a receive buffer
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:04:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE8A3C3.1070003@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE8A098.8040207@trash.net>
On 10/28/2009 12:50 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> And, even 1MB may not be enough for some scenarios. So, probably best to
>> let users over-ride the initial setting on cmd-line. If not, then use
>> a large value to start with.
>
> How about this? It uses 1MB as receive buf limit by default (without
> increasing /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max it will be limited by less
> however) and allows to specify the size manually using "-rcvbuf X"
> (-r is already used, so you need to specify at least -rc).
>
> Additionally rtnl_listen() continues on ENOBUFS after printing the
> error message.
Looks good..except:
If rmem_max is smaller than 1M, will that cause setsocktopt to
fail and thus fail early out of rtnl_open_byproto?
Maybe we should only print errors but not return in that method
when setsockopt fails?
In another project, I ended up trying ever smaller values until one
worked in order to get near what the user wanted even if rmem_max
was configured smaller. Not sure if that is worth doing here or not.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 23:16 iproute uses too small of a receive buffer Ben Greear
2009-10-27 23:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-27 23:30 ` Ben Greear
2009-10-28 7:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28 7:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28 7:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28 7:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28 7:55 ` David Miller
2009-10-28 19:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-28 19:19 ` Ben Greear
2009-10-28 19:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-28 20:04 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2009-10-28 20:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-28 20:21 ` Ben Greear
2009-11-10 17:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-28 20:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29 8:17 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE8A3C3.1070003@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).