From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] vlan: Optimize multiple unregistration
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:05:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE8A425.1000600@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE728A9.2080209@gmail.com>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Use unregister_netdevice_many() to speedup master device unregister.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/if_vlan.h | 1
> net/8021q/vlan.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> net/core/dev.c | 1
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_vlan.h b/include/linux/if_vlan.h
> index 8898cbe..71a4870 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_vlan.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_vlan.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct vlan_group {
> * the vlan is attached to.
> */
> unsigned int nr_vlans;
> + int killall;
> struct hlist_node hlist; /* linked list */
> struct net_device **vlan_devices_arrays[VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_SPLIT_PARTS];
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan.c b/net/8021q/vlan.c
> index 6b5c9dd..511afe7 100644
> --- a/net/8021q/vlan.c
> +++ b/net/8021q/vlan.c
> @@ -159,11 +159,12 @@ void unregister_vlan_dev(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
> if (real_dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_FILTER)
> ops->ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid(real_dev, vlan_id);
>
> - vlan_group_set_device(grp, vlan_id, NULL);
> grp->nr_vlans--;
>
> - synchronize_net();
> -
> + if (!grp->killall) {
> + vlan_group_set_device(grp, vlan_id, NULL);
> + synchronize_net();
> + }
> unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
>
> /* If the group is now empty, kill off the group. */
> @@ -183,6 +184,34 @@ void unregister_vlan_dev(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
> dev_put(real_dev);
> }
>
> +void unregister_vlan_dev_alls(struct vlan_group *grp)
This could be static.
> +{
> + LIST_HEAD(list);
> + int i;
> + struct net_device *vlandev;
> + struct vlan_group save;
> +
> + memcpy(&save, grp, sizeof(save));
> + memset(&grp->vlan_devices_arrays, 0, sizeof(grp->vlan_devices_arrays));
This shouldn't be necessary since the lower device is already in the
process of being unregistered. If it was necessary, it could cause
crashes since the individual pointers are not set to zero atomically.
Or maybe I'm misunderstanding the purpose entirely :)
> + grp->killall = 1;
> +
> + synchronize_net();
> +
> + /* Delete all VLANs for this dev. */
> + for (i = 0; i < VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_LEN; i++) {
> + vlandev = vlan_group_get_device(&save, i);
> + if (!vlandev)
> + continue;
> +
> + unregister_vlan_dev(vlandev, &list);
> + if (grp->nr_vlans == 0)
> + break;
> + }
> + unregister_netdevice_many(&list);
> + for (i = 0; i < VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_SPLIT_PARTS; i++)
> + kfree(save.vlan_devices_arrays[i]);
> +}
> +
> static void vlan_transfer_operstate(const struct net_device *dev,
> struct net_device *vlandev)
> {
> @@ -524,19 +553,7 @@ static int vlan_device_event(struct notifier_block *unused, unsigned long event,
> break;
>
> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> - /* Delete all VLANs for this dev. */
> - for (i = 0; i < VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_LEN; i++) {
> - vlandev = vlan_group_get_device(grp, i);
> - if (!vlandev)
> - continue;
> -
> - /* unregistration of last vlan destroys group, abort
> - * afterwards */
> - if (grp->nr_vlans == 1)
> - i = VLAN_GROUP_ARRAY_LEN;
> -
> - unregister_vlan_dev(vlandev, NULL);
> - }
> + unregister_vlan_dev_alls(grp);
> break;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 17:06 [PATCH 4/6] vlan: Optimize multiple unregistration Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28 20:05 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-10-28 20:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29 13:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-29 14:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-29 14:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29 14:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-29 14:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29 17:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-30 6:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-30 6:43 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE8A425.1000600@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).